Hi folks, I'm back (Barkley Rosser that is). Have been gone for over five months and have only been following this discussion for several days, although I have certainly been following the events in question. A few observations: 1) What is really holding up the Hong Kong peg is China. As long as the PRC does not devalue the yuan, you will not see Hong Kong undoing its peg, even if that means running 1000% interest rates. After all, HK is there now to serve China, and its capitalists must pay accordingly. They will get their rewards later if they are good little boys... 2) China and Japan remain the keys, if simply because of their sheer size and their relationships with the rest of the world. 3) If China does not devalue, one can expect eventually even the pathetic Indonesian rupiah to bounce and go up. After all, these countries were almost all running current account surpluses (well, not ROK), prior to the crashes. Their currencies are all now way undervalued by any measure, Dornbusch-styly overshooting evident here. Of course, if the PRC devalues, then there will be another wave of competitive devaluations and all bets will be off. This is why Larry Summers was over in Beijing huffing and puffing so hard to keep the house of cards up, :-). 4) Japan remains far larger both as an economy and as a financial power than all the rest of Asia put together. It is also in the position of being the US's creditor. For all the current love of the $ out there, the US is now the world's largest debtor and becoming more so increasingly rapidly by the minute (right, Doug? How's the book doing?). Don't be surprised if the US needs an IMF bailout soon and is told to "get austere". It was because of the Japanese banks' bad loans in ROK that the secondary bailout was made for ROK. If Japan goes sour then it could pull the plug on the US and the whole business. But, rest easy global capitalists, the Japanese stock market is currently surging. What's up there anyway? Who knows? Barkley Rosser (back from Paris) On Fri, 16 Jan 1998 21:48:39 -0800 Tom Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Doug Henwood wrote, > > >It could happen that way for sure. But Erdman has predicted 3 out of the > >last 0 depressions. > > Quantitatively that looks like a .000 average. But qualitatively it may > still be better than predicting 0 out of the last 3 depressions. > > Regards, > > Tom Walker > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Know Ware Communications > Vancouver, B.C., CANADA > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (604) 688-8296 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > The TimeWork Web: http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/ > -- Rosser Jr, John Barkley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The Hong Kong peg?
Rosser Jr, John Barkley Sat, 17 Jan 1998 16:52:40 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- The Hong Kong peg? Tom Walker
- Re: The Hong Kong peg? Doug Henwood
- Re: The Hong Kong peg? James Devine
- Re: The Hong Kong peg? Dennis R Redmond
- Re: The Hong Kong peg? Rob Schaap
- Re: The Hong Kong peg? Tom Walker
- Re: The Hong Kong peg? Rosser Jr, John Barkley
- Re: The Hong Kong peg? Martin Hart-Landsberg
- Re: The Hong Kong peg? Doug Henwood
- Re: The Hong Kong peg? michael
- Re: The Hong Kong peg? Dennis R Redmond
- Re: The Hong Kong peg? Doug Henwood
- Re: The Hong Kong peg? Doug Henwood
- Re: The Hong Kong peg? Tom Walker
- Re: The Hong Kong peg? Tom Walker
- RE: The Hong Kong peg? Aidi A Rahim