8. Under Article III of the UN Convention the following acts
      are punishable under the law:
      a) Genocide;
      b) Conspiracy to Commit Genocide
      c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
      d) Attempt to commit genocide;
      e) Complicity in genocide
      
   9. "Article IV states that all persons shall be held accountable
       for acts committed under Article III, 'whether they are
       constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials, or
       private individuals.' Article V calls upon the nations
       of the world to enact 'the necessary legislation to give
       effect to the present Convention and, in particular, to
       provide effective penalties for persons guilty of genocide
       or any of the other acts enumerated under III.' The 
       Convention was intended to prevent as well as punish commission
       of genocide. Thus a broad latitude of meaning, centering on
       notions of 'advocacy' has been associated with the provisions
       concerning incitement of [Article III (c)] and complicity
       in [Article III (e)] genocide and/or genocidal processes.
       (Churchill, Ibid. p.15) In situations where there is 
       disagreement as to the meaning of such terms, or in which a 
       given government professes confusion concerning the substance
       of the law, the Convention provides, under Article IX, for 
       the interpretation and adjudication by the International Court 
       of Justice [ICJ]." (Ibid p.15);
       
  10.  Although most nations ratified the Genocide Convention, the
       US declined to do so for 40 years. "The reason for this 
       extensive delay resides primarily, as is revealed in the 
       records of Senate debates on the Genocide Convention since
       it was referred to that body by President Truman in 1950,
       in congressional concern that a broad range of federal policies
       vis-a-vis minority populations in the U.S. might be viewed
       as genocidally criminal under international law." (see Lawrence 
       J. LeBlanc, "The United States and the Genocide Convention
       Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1991) quoted Ibid p. 16
       
 11.   "Considerable anxiety was expressed by various senators and
        expert witnesses over the eyars that certain activities of
        subordinate (state and local) governments and private
        parties, each of them sanctioned and/or protected by the
        federal government, might well violate the terms of the
        Convention. (Ibid p. 16) Examples include the persistence of
        'Jim Crow' laws in various southern states, despite the
        extreme and well-recognized harm such statutes imposed
        upon African-American and other readily identifiable
        minority populations." (Ibid p. 16)
        
12.     When the United States finally ratified the Genocide 
        Convention during the closing days of the 100th Congress, it 
        was largely on the basis of a growing belief that the U.S.
        was forfeiting 'moral leadership' in world affairs as a 
        result of its nonratification, (see 132 Congressional Record
        S1253-77, FEb 18, 1986 and also see U.S. Senate Hearings
        on the Genocide Convention Before the Senate Committee on
        Foreign Relations 97th Cong. 1st Session, U.S. Government
        Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1985) and on the basis
        of the Genocide Implementation Act of 1988 (Title 18,
        Part I, U.S.C.; otherwise known as "The Proxmire Act",
        a statute which incorporated certain language designed to 
        narrow the intent of the internationally-accepted
        convention in its application to the United States."
        (U.S. Senate, Hearing on Legislation to Implement the
        Genocide Convention Before the Senate Committee on the
        Judiciary (S 1851) Washington, D.C. 100th Congress,
        2nd Session, U.S. Govt Printing Office, 1989) quoted
        Ibid. p 17.)
        
        To be continued....
                                   

*-------------------------------------------------------------------*
*                             "Let me be a free man, free to travel,* 
*  James Craven               free to stop, free to work, free to   *
*  Dept of Economics          trade where I choose, free to choose  *  
*  Clark College              my own teachers, free to follow the   *
*  1800 E. Mc Loughlin Blvd.  religion of my fathers [and mothers], * 
*  Vancouver, Wa. 98663       free to talk, think and act for       *
*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]          myself--and I will obey every law or  *
*  (360) 992-2283 (Office)    submit to the penalty."               *
*  (360) 992-2863 (Fax)       (In-mut-too-yah-lat-lat, Chief Joseph *
*                             of the Nez Perce.)                    *
* MY EMPLOYER HAS NO ASSOCIATION WITH MY PRIVATE/PROTECTED OPINION  * 



Reply via email to