Louis Proyect wrote: > . For example, only 4 years ago Joel Kovel wrote a lengthy piece in > CNS that argued that Marxism is weak on ecological questions because it > lacks a spiritual dimension. I always have thought that the Unconscious was the Holy Ghost in 19th-c positivist disguise. That old reactionary jerk T.S. Eliot had an appropriate comment on such things in his reaction to Arnoldian attempts to make literature a substsitute for religion. I don't remember how he worded it, but the core idea was that if you rejected religion, then get on with it and don't moon about looking for substitutes. Spirituality is a more or less corrupted form of human social solidarity. Among the atomized individuals of capitalist society spirituality becomes absolutely corrupt. Carrol
- Marx's life and theory (fwd) Louis Proyect
- Re: Marx's life and theory (fwd) Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Marx's life and theory (fwd) Michael Hoover
- Re: Re: Marx's life and theory (fwd) Louis Proyect
- Marx's life and theory (fwd) md7148
- Re: Marx's life and theory (fwd) Jim Devine
- Re: Marx's life and theory (fwd) md7148
- Re: Re: Marx's life and theory (fwd) Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Marx's life and theory (fwd) Carrol Cox
- Marx's life and theory (fwd) Louis Proyect
- Marx's life and theory Carrol Cox
- Marx's life and theory Michael Keaney
- Re: Marx's life and theory Louis Proyect
- Re: Marx's life and theory Ted Winslow
- Re: Re: Marx's life and theory Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: Marx's life and theor... Ted Winslow
- Re: Marx's life and theory Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Marx's life and theory Ted Winslow
- Re: Marx's life and theory Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Marx's life and theory Ted Winslow
- Re: Re: Marx's life and theory Carrol Cox