I have. It is first rate, and suprisingly well written for someone who is pretty firmly in the neoclassical camp. Be warned though; Thaler is heavily into denial. He rationalizes away (so to speak) most of the more subversive implications of the collection. To get the most out of it, you have to do a kind of "King's Messenger" reading. Bill Rosenberg wrote: > > Has anyone read/have views on "The Winner's Curse: Paradoxes and > Anomalies of Economic Life" by Richard Thaler? According to Brian > Easton in the NZ "Listener" (6 June) it "describes 13 general > anomalies where the standard economic theory of indivdual behaviour > is contradicted by the evidence. Together, they present a serious > challenge to the 'economic rationalism' that is used to justify so > much recent economic policy." Easton gives savings behaviour as an > example. > > Bill > > Bill Rosenberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
