I know that Michael wants this to stop, and this will 
be my only post on it.  But as a witness (and sometime 
participant) to much of what has been referred to, and in 
perhaps an effort to bring Jerry around to where he can 
stop chewing on old bones in public, I am posting this 
anyhow (sorry, Michael, silence on this after this).
     First off:  Yes, let's all "take a stand against 
homophobia, cop baiting, sexism, death threats, anti-labor 
activism, etc." (not sure what is included in that "etc." 
but we'll let that pass).  Have the accused been guilty of 
making statements on the internet or engaging in actions 
off the net that could be interepreted as fitting in with 
these designations?  YES.  They are GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY! 
Let me be more specific:
     1)  Jerry is correct that Mark Jones made his bizarre 
and indefensible statement about NLR on m-i.  GUILTY! 
(homophobia, cop-baiting, and?...)
     2)  Jerry is correct that Louis once made 
inappropriate statements to Jerry's boss.  GUILTY! 
(anti-labor activism, and?...)  That particular incident 
has been vetted at length on this list some time ago.  At 
the time I largely sided with Jerry, although thought and 
still think that he way overreacted.
     3)  On the original marxism list, Louis went on a 
vendetta against bob malecki, who was on this list for a 
brief period of time (remember the bad spelling?).  Bob had 
posted his autobiography which was quite a wonder, 
including his tales of anti-Vietnam War activism and a lot 
of bizarre events that might reflect that he took enough 
LSD to make Hunter S. Thompson look like "Calmy and Clearly 
Thinking in Las Vegas."  Louis decided that malecki was an 
FBI agent and went on a bender.  In the end the best Louis 
could come up with was some minor factual goofs and of 
course some hallucinatory episodes.  But he failed in his 
main effort.  It may well have been lnp's lowest moment.  
GUILTY!  (cop-baiting, and?...)
     This episode was nearly repeated recently when Louis 
almost sent an FOIA to the FBI and CIA about "Murray."  
However, this time he had the sense to back off when 
requested to do so by various list managers.  Although it 
has been roundly denied, many continue to suspect that this 
was the straw that broke the back of Spoons support of the 
marxism lists, despite Louis's backing off.
     All right, so they're guilty as hell, Jerry, and I 
have just roundly denounced them for you again, public 
flaying and all that.  So, waddayawannadoboudit?  Should 
Michael P. purge them?  Should we have serial denunciations 
of them in which every list participant opens by whacking 
them for their various awful statements and actions?  It is 
clear that Michael P. is very uninterested and 
unsympathetic in any such endeavors and I support him in 
this.
     The main reason is that I think that cyberspace is 
evolving, that people can actually learn to behave better 

and that some do so (also, Michael runs a tight ship so 
that most participants know that major crap will not be 
tolerated).  
     Mark's egregeious remarks occurred last spring on m-i. 
This was the period when there was all-out war over 
Stalin's Moscow Trials.  You wanted Adolfo Olaechea removed 
for his death threats (oh yes, I forgot to denounce those 
as well: Mark, GUILTY!)  Adolfo wanted various people, 
including a list moderator (Zeynep, long gone, whatever 
happened to her anyway?) removed because she opposed 
removing people who criticized Stalin.  Mark was very 
frenzied back then and blew up frequently at lots of 
people, myself included.  A bunch of them (Adolfo, Mark, 
some others) ran off to the LeninList until it blew up in 
an ideological frenzy when many of them returned.  Mark has 
been much better behaved since his return (although he 
pulled some nasty pot shots on marxism-thaxis not too long 
ago).  He has even recently been on the receiving end of 
denunciations by Adolfo for not being 100% supportive of 
old Uncle Joe.
     I have frequently noted that Louis P. has much 
improved.  I think that he has learned his lesson, that 
flaming is a self-defeating game.  When I look at the 
various participants in this, I can look at what we might 
call the flame/substance ratio.  In the cases of both Mark 
and Louis, their flame/substance ratios have fallen 
dramatically.  I think that they should be applauded for 
this and further encouraged, not continually and ritually 
denounced, flayed, and purged.  Is this what you really 
want, Jerry?
     Jerry, you have your OPE-L with its closed archive 
where you can discuss pure theory.  Pen-l is doing fine, 
even if the volume is down since the appearance of lbo-talk 
(which you won't go on because Doug H. is another person on 
your shit list: which crimes is he guilty of? (no, please 
don't tell us!)).
     So, who is it for whom the flame/substance ratio has 
been not only not decreasing, but increasing?  I am afraid, 
Jerry, that it is you.  It is not because you are flaming 
more, but because you have been posting substantively less. 
I suspect that it is the observation of this ratio over a 
long period of time that has led Michael P. and a lot of 
the rest of us to lack sympathy for your complaints and to 
ask you to cut it out.  Maybe you shouldn't let bygones be 
bygones, but most of us are by now well aware of the 
imperfections of some of our fellow posters. 
     I strongly suggest that you make a serious effort to 
lower your flame/substance ratio, particularly by raising 
the denominator.  I concur with Michael P. that you are 
credible, intelligent, and articulate about many subjects 
that get discussed on this list.  Let's hear those 
offerings, please!
Barkley Rosser
On Fri, 22 May 1998 08:03:43 -0700 michael 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> This has to stop!  I contacted Louis yesterday and asked him not to respond to
> Jerry's last post.  He graciously agreed.  We have better things to do than
> engage in flame wars.
> 
> As I understand, this is the sort of behavior that ended the marxism lists.
> Please, Jerry, on all other subjects you seem admirable in every respect.  You
> have to stop this.
> 
> Gerald Levy wrote:
> 
> > I tried to send the following to the list yesterday. For some mysterious
> > reason, it wasn't posted even though it didn't bounce back to me as
> > undeliverable. Strange.
> >
> > But, before returning to the original issue under discussion, I want to
> > disagree somewhat with Paul Z: indeed there are certain principles for
> > socialists, including but not limited to: solidarity, internationalism,
> > opposition to imperialism, opposition to exploitation and oppression, etc.
> >
> > As for the more precise question of whether Mark Jones and Proyect are
> > principled, I believe the following post offers a definitive answer. But,
> > in case there are ***any*** doubts about Mark J, remember what he had to
> > say:
> >
> > He wrote that:
> >
> > The _New Left Review_ is a "faggot-valhalla" controlled by M16!
> >
> > Did you hear that? I'll repeat it again ...
> >
> > Mark Jones wrote that:
> >
> > ***The _New Left Review_ is a "faggot-valhalla" controlled by M16!***
> >
> > Did the significance of that statement sink in yet? So that you can't
> > forget, let me repeat for a third time ...
> >
> > Mark Jones wrote that:
> >
> > ***THE _NEW LEFT REVIEW_ IS A "FAGGOT-VALHALLA" CONTROLLED BY M16!***
> >
> > Jones sounds like Lyndon LaRouche, doesn't he? He wrote the above on a
> > Internet mailing list (M-INT). He not only refused to apologize but even
> > defended it afterwards to the list. You don't have to take my word for
> > this: you can check-out the M-INT archives. Doug H was on that list at the
> > time so he should remember as well. I think Barkley was there as well.
> >
> > What does the above quote say about Jones? It says that he is --
> >
> > a) viciously homophobic!
> > b) a cop-baiter!
> > c) libelous!
> > d) he has a conspiracy theory about _NLR_ that would make Lyndon LaRouche
> >    blush!
> >
> > Yet this is the person that Michael has praised! This is the
> > Stalin-worshiper that Proyect has entered into an unprincipled
> > combination with!
> >
> > On to yesterday's post ...
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 07:37:16-0400 (EDT)
> > From: Gerald Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Progressive Economics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: on the status of the pen-l list
> >
> > Michael wrote:
> >
> > > Let bygones be bygones.
> > > The real enemy resides elsewhere.
> >
> > You still don't get it, do you?
> >
> > Re Jones: Not only is he viciously homophobic, but he also routinely
> > calls others on the left "provocateurs", "counter-revolutionaries",
> > "agents of US imperialism", etc. without any proof whatsoever. He has even
> > -- on more than one occasion -- supported death threats against other
> > leftists who don't agree with him.
> >
> > Should we say: "Let bygones be bygones" to Jones?  Not only would this
> > be seen as a defense of (verbal) gay-bashing, but we would also be saying
> > that cop-baiting and death threats are OK.
> >
> > Re Proyect: he *is* (part of) the real enemy! He is a member of management
> > who has threatened to seek to have other leftists fired and has even
> > contacted mgt. to get someone silenced and/or fired. He has also --
> > knowinglyly, falsely, and maliciously -- accused someone of being an FBI
> > agent.
> >
> > Does it matter at all if the reputation of a revolutionary is tainted
> > forever by this charge that he was an FBI agent? If we say "Let bygones be
> > bygones" to Proyect, we would be slapping this individual in the face
> > again. Does it matter at all that a so-called "Marxist" has *crossed class
> > lines* and _joined_ the real enemy by his actions?
> >
> > For Proyect, there is *NO* forgiving and forgetting. Moreover, it matters
> > not one bit whether his actions occurred on pen-l or elsewhere. It matters
> > not one bit whether he also writes posts which are not flames. What
> > should *only* matter to us is that he has become an enemy of the working
> > class -- a Benedict Arnold of the workers' movement.
> >
> > > I would like to see us accomplish something.
> >
> > How can we expect to accomplish anything unless we can take a stand
> > against homophobia, death threats, sexism, cop-baiting, anti-labor
> > activism, etc?
> >
> > Jerry
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Perelman
> Economics Department
> California State University
> Chico, CA 95929
> 
> Tel. 530-898-5321
> E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
Rosser Jr, John Barkley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to