>Is there a Marxist theory of desire, or to use the word Foucault preferred >(because it's nonteleological), pleasure? > >Doug Desire? I don't have the foggiest idea. It certainly doesn't sound like the kind of thing you'd take a vote on in a preconvention discussion. That's for darned sure. Louis Proyect (http://www.panix.com/~lnp3/marxism.html)
