One is more able to get this with the complexity models with lots of agents and lots of disaggregation. Then one can see such interactions more easily. Barkley Rosser On Wed, 12 Aug 1998 16:23:00 -0500 (CDT) "William S. Lear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, August 12, 1998 at 17:19:38 (-0400) Rosser Jr, John Barkley writes: > >... > > My statements were general and irrespective of who is > >stable and who isn't and did not imply any necessary > >relation that stability of exploiter equals instability of > >exploitee, or vice versa. > > Yes, I realize that, but don't you think that models should be able to > express this form? It seems that this form of sloughing off > "instability" onto the mass of society is a very important and much > more frequent phenomenon than any sort of aggregate instability. I > just wondered if your (or anyone's) chaoplex models captured such a > notion... > > > Bill > -- Rosser Jr, John Barkley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PEN-L:810] Re: Re: chaoplexity and institutions
Rosser Jr, John Barkley Wed, 12 Aug 1998 17:59:03 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)