My personal favorite, quite appropriately captured on the insciption 
on Marx's grave at Highgate Cemetary and summing up Marx's life 
work--from his Theses on Feuerbach:
            "The philosophers have only interpreted the world in 
            various ways; the point, however, is to change it."

                                                Jim Craven

4 May 98 at 13:31, William S. Lear wrote:

> On Mon, May 4, 1998 at 13:51:58 (-0400) Doug Henwood writes:
> >...
> >We need more on 1), I'd say. I put Verso's Manifesto poster up over my
> >desk, with the Komar/Melamid flag on top, and "WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNITE,
> >YOU HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BUT YOUR CHAINS," all in caps below. ...
> 
> Oooh, I want one!  Where can I get it??  Hell, let's get some T-shirts
> while we're at it.
> 
> >                                                         .... Staring at
> >it, I first thought that the language of chains didn't have much appeal to
> >the people who were the likely targets of the poster. Sure, there are
> >(mostly figuratively, some literally) chained proletarians in New York City
> >and Juarez, but most First World workers wouldn't even want to see
> >themselves as chained. Then I thought about those auto and steel workers
> >who loved their 50+ hour weeks, so they could earn lots of overtime and
> >pull down $80-100,000 a year. Killing themselves, killing any chance of a
> >civilized home or social life, for what? SUVs? These are chains of a
> >different sort, but people are so alienated that they can't even see them.
> >So they turn to self-help books and Viagra.
> 
> I second this, heartily.
> 
> As Chomsky said, "we are entangled in webs of endless deceit".  I was
> feverishly thinking of sexuality, SUV's, suburban life, and
> externalities the other day while driving home through Austin's now
> poisoned, smog-laden air.  I do think the notion of private goods is
> also useful to consider with the morally precedent concern of
> alienation.  The bias for private consumption goods infects
> everything.  Sexuality, as usually produced, is consumable by the
> individual; the images in popular culture of sexuality speak of an
> anti-social, stripped-down, cheapened sensuality.  The images are
> consumed, they titillate, but no tendrils of social utility spring
> forth from these tawdry substitutes of sensuality set within a richer
> social context; the images are presented in a social vacuum, a space
> in which only individual values are visible... the market filters this
> and everything, just as it filters information and manufactures our
> consent...
> 
> This bias, and countless others, condition our preferences for them,
> feed back into the production system to produce still more private
> goods, and in turn our desires become part of the webs of deceit that
> fasten us securely to a system that robs us of freedom, despoils our
> environment, tears apart and stunts our non-market social relations,
> etc.
> 
> 
> Bill
> 

 James Craven             
 Dept. of Economics,Clark College
 1800 E. McLoughlin Blvd. Vancouver, WA. 98663
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (360)992-2283(Office),2863(fax)

"This Constitution, and the laws of the United 
States which shall be made in pursuance thereof,
 AND ALL TREATIES MADE, OR WHICH SHALL BE MADE,
under the authority of the United States, SHALL
 BE THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND; and the judges
 in every State SHALL BE BOUND THEREBY, ANYTHING
 IN THE CONSTITUTION OR LAWS OF ANY STATE TO THE 
CONTRARY NOTWITHSTANDING." (Article VI, Sec. 2)
*My Employer has no association with My Private and Protected Opinion*


Reply via email to