The Pinochet affair is taking on very interesting aspects here in
Bolivia.
As I noted in other missives, Gen. Hugo Banzer took power through a coup

here in Bolivia in 1971, and remained in power until 1978.  During his
time
in power he formed part of what a local journalist has aptly called the
"MERCOSUR of Terror", that is, the formal alliance of southern cone
dictators, who through Operation Condor (and other mechanisms) did each
others' dirty work, such as deproting/repatriating people to their
deaths.

In the documents that seek to extradite Pinochet to Spain from England,
Banzer and Bolivia are mentioned, causing pathetic gyrations and
disclaimers here. The "collateral damage" caused by the Pinochet affair
is
really opening up the past here.  Some details follow.

First, Banzer pathetically falls all over himself to deny any knowledge
of
Operation Condor.  "I tell you," he said yesterday, "as an article of
faith
between men [this is the sort of macho shit such dictators cannot purge
from their language] I never knew of the existence of Operation Condor,
because as far as I know, it never operated in this country, and as such

that it would be impossible for me to have been involved in it."

Nonetheless, senator Hugo Carvajal of the Bolivian MIR, an ally of
Banzer's
ADN party since 1989 and current member of his coalition government,
stated
categorically "Bolivia was involved and we can't lie about it."

The evidence seems to suggest Carvajal is right.  For example, on 2
April
1975, Graciela Antonia Rutilo Artes, the daughter of Spanish parents,
was
captured in the Bolivian city of Oruro, and turned over to Argentinian
authorities, never to surface again.  And on 13 November 1976 Julio de
Transito Valladares was turned over by Bolivian authorities to their
Chilean counterparts.  He too disappeared.  These two cases are cited in

judge Garzon's documents; others cases are well known to the Bolivian
human
rights community.  All of these cases suggest real coordination  between

dictators.  MERCOSUR indeed.  And as I noted before, it is unimaginable
that the US, given it's level of support to regional dictators (Banzer
was
a School of the America's graduate, etc.), wasn't fully aware and
supportive of such coordination.

Other details:

* Banzer was confronted by a 29 year old jounalist on these details, and
he
responded: "you were 3 years old at the time ... so how could you have
evidence?"

* The head of Banzer's ADN party, Enrique Toro, noted that the cause of
all
the hoopla is an international leftist conspiracy.  Later he elaborated
further, suggesting the "Spaniards have decided to return to being the
Conquistadores of America," likening Spanish judge Garzon to Pizarro,
Almagro, and Cortez.  With what moral authority, he asked, could the
Spaniards, a monarchy, criticize Bolivian democracy?  The bottom line,
he
stated, is that Pinochet took power by force, wrote his own
constitution,
and was voted out by the Chilean people.  In contrast, Banzer came to
power
by force, yes, but in an alliance with the two most important political
parties of the time.  Further, he was democratically re-elected.  (Note:

all of this is true, but does not lead to the conclusion this
functionary
would like us to draw.  Rather it shows: (a) political parties here are
hopelessly corrupt and opportunistic; (b) politicians, as always, take
as a
positive mandate the outcomes the results of negative
lesser-of-two-evils
elections; and (c) the peculiarities of Bolivias current political
system:
if no party obtains a simple majority, the horse trading between parties

starts, the results being unholy alliances of opportunists who barter
votes
to form coalition governments.  Democracy?

* According to the Madrid newspaper El Mundo, Banzer's wife Lucia
Hiliart
says old Augusto doesn't yet know he's under arrest, of that his
diplomatic
passport is not being "respected."  She noted "If Augusto finds out
about
what's going on, he'll have an attack of rage and die."  Hmm.  Anybody
want
to let it slip to the old fucker?

Tom

PS:As I am writing from a cybercafe, please don't respond by hitting
ctrl +
r.  Send responses to:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--

Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chico, CA 95929
530-898-5321
fax 530-898-5901



Reply via email to