Michael Eisenscher wrote: >We have allowed the Right to appropriate this language because we failed to >contest in this corner of the ideological arena. I'm not sure about this. I think once you start talking about "family" you're on the right's ideological terrain. Sort of like the "progressive" use of pension funds - once you start playing the stock game, things are likely to slip in their direction. Why should progressives/radicals/whatevers even foreground family as a political issue in the first place? Doug
