Immanuel Kant, "Physical Geography", Volume 8 of "Gesammelte Schriften":

The inhabitant of the temperate parts of the world, above all the central
part, has a more beautiful body, works harder, is more jocular, more
controlled in his passions, more intelligent than any other race of people
in the world. That is why at all points in time these peoples have educated
the others and controlled them with weapons. The Romans, Greeks, the
ancient Nordic peoples, Genghis Khan, the Turks, Tamurlaine, the Europeans
after Columbus's discoveries, they have all amazed the southern lands with
their arts and weapons.

(cited in Eze's "Race and the Enlightenment," p. 64)

********

Janet Abu-Lughod, "Before European Hegemony: The World System A.D.
1250-1350", pp 323-324:

In the past, before western scholars had sufficient information about
China's achievements in science and technology, it was commonly argued that
Europe's eventual triumph in the world arena was the result of her unique
scientific and technological inventiveness. and, conversely, that
Orientals, although perhaps "clever,". had never been able to sustain a
scientific revolution. The voluminous investigations of Needham have more
than corrected this error. We now have much fuller documentation on Chinese
contributions to medicine and physiology, physics, and mathematics, as well
as their more practical applications in technology.

According to Sivin, Needham did not go far enough; he stopped short of
admitting that, by Sung times, China had had a true scientific
"revolution," a position strongly argued by Chinese scholars. Whether or
not the term "scientific revolution" is justified, there can be no doubt
that in late medieval times the level of Chinese technical competence far
exceeded the Middle East, which, in turn, had outstripped Europe for many
centuries. Space permits only a few examples here: paper and printing, iron
and weaponry (including guns, cannons, and bombs), shipbuilding and
navigational techniques, as well as two primary manufactured exports, silk
and porcelain.

According to Tsien:

"Paper was invented in China before the Christian era, adopted for at the
beginning of the 1st century A.D., and manufactured with new and fresh
fibres from the early 2nd century...Woodblock printing was first
employed...around 700 A.D. and moveable type in middle of the 11th century."

Some time in the ninth century, the Arabs learned the process of paper
making from the Chinese and later transmitted that precious  knowledge to
"westerners." Braudel (1973: 295) suggests that the European paper mills
appeared in twelfth-century Spain but the Italians did not begin to produce
paper until the fourteenth century; Cipolla , basing his remarks on a 1953
article Irigoin, however, claims that by the second half of the thirteenth
century the court in Byzantium no longer bought its paper from Arabs but
from Italy. But in any case, China's edge was significant.

Even more impressive than paper manufacture were Chinese advances in
siderurgv. which were several hundred years in advance Europe's. From at
least the eighth century onward, coal was being mined in northern China and
used in furnaces that produced high-quality iron and even steel "either by
means of the co-fusion of pig iron and wrought iron, or by direct
decarbonization in a cold oxidizing blast."

Hartwell's (1967) estimates of the scale of iron production are truly
staggering. By his calculations, the tonnage of coal burned annually in the
eleventh century for iron production alone in northern China was "roughly
equivalent to 70 percent of the total amount of coal annually used by all
metal workers in Great Britain at the beginning of the eighteenth century"
By the end of the eleventh century the Sung were minting iron coins and
making many metal products as well. According to Hartwell:

"7,000 workers were engaged in actually mining the ore and fuel, and
operating the furnaces, forges, and refining hearths...[while] others were
engaged in transporting the raw materials from the mines to the iron
works.The scale of production at individual establishments was
unprecedented, and probably was not equalled anywhere in the world until
the Industrial Revolution of the nineteenth century."

If we add to the workers engaged in direct ore extraction and processing
those workers who fabricated tools and weaponry, there can be no doubt as
to the high level of China's industrial development.


Louis Proyect
(http://www.panix.com/~lnp3/marxism.html)



Reply via email to