G'day Jim, >that is, is the problem with the _theory_ or is it with the theory's >adherent's style? I don't think it's the theory, Jim. The way I understand said theory, we find out what we should do now by reflecting on what's happening in light of our past practice. Any advocate of that theory who imposes on the rest of us an assessment of the progressiveness of our politics, or tells us what to do - and does so with the moot legitimation afforded by a particular reading of militants and theorists removed from us by much time and many kliks - is asking for particularly ruthless criticism in terms of their own theory, I submit. I may not quite know what democratic centralism might look like, but I know a bureaucratically centralist position when I see one. Yours, A proud admirer of P. Dorman and R. Hahnel both.
- Re: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel (fwd) Louis Proyect
- Re: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel (fwd) Timework Web
- Re: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel (fwd) md7148
- RE: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel (fwd) md7148
- Re: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel (fwd) Michael Perelman
- Re: RE: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel (fwd) Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: RE: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel (fwd) Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: RE: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel (fwd) Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel (fwd) JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel (fwd) Jim Devine
- Re: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel (fwd) Rob Schaap
- Re: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel (fwd) JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel (fwd) JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel (f... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Peter Dorman and RobinHa... Doyle Saylor
- "Jerks", was Re: Peter Dorman and... Carrol Cox
- Re: "Jerks", was Re: Peter Do... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: "Jerks", was Re: ... Doyle Saylor
- RE: Re: Re: "Jerks", ... Max Sawicky
- Re: "Jerks", was Re: Peter Do... Jim Devine
- Re: "Jerks", was Re: Peter Do... Doyle Saylor