Forwarded message:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 13:31:35 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Sid Shniad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: LABOUR LEADERS TO TARGET NEW ROUND OF GLOBAL TRADE TALKS
X-UID: 6925

The Toronto Star                                January 31, 1999

LABOUR LEADERS TO TARGET NEW ROUND OF GLOBAL TRADE TALKS

DAVOS, Switzerland - After helping defeat the Multilateral Agreement on
Investment (MAI), labour leaders plan to turn their sights next on a
proposed new round of global trade talks under the World Trade
Organization.

This is part of a backlash by labour leaders who blame globalization
for high unemployment, growing inequality and severe cutbacks to the
social safety net.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum yesterday, John Sweeney, president
of the American Federation of Labour, said the debate on the future
world economic system ``can no longer be contained in closed rooms in
luxurious hotels.''

Sweeney said labour leaders will be converging on Seattle at the end of
November, when trade ministers from around the world meet to launch a
new round of global trade negotiations, to demand that that this include
a strong commitment to worker and human rights and the environment.

In particular, labour unions from around the world are demanding that
new trade agreements entrench the core labour standards of the
International Labour Organization.

These are: freedom of association; the right to collective bargaining;
no forced labour; no discrimination; and the elimination of child
labour.

The terrible social and economic costs of the global financial crisis
can have a sobering effect, Sweeney said.

''For two decades, conservative governments have been on a binge,
dismantling controls over capital, currencies and corporations. Now we
awake, the morning after, our heads aching, our hearts burdened by the
destruction we see around us.''




-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to