Jim D, rebutting someone, in part:
> >... Day and Walter are more concerned with the much longer wave
> >(300 years) theory of "la duree" due to Fernand Braudel,...
>
> This reminds me of the 3000 year Enived cycle, of which the Braudel cycle
> is but a small fraction. We are currently 500 years into "phase B" of the
> Enived Wave, which implies that we have 1000 more years of decline in front
> of us.
Quite a revelation for this peon. Does the presumed Dr Enived hold
the title, or are there wave theories that push to the very portal
of geological time? Of what practical application?
valis
