At 08:21 AM 4/22/99 -0700, Jim Devine wrote:
>>... There is no causal link between gun ownership and crime. In
>Whatever the answer, it seems to me that having a solid community where
>individuals feel a part of a society with others they are less likely to
>want to hold guns. Liberal efforts at gun control seem to miss this point.
>
>The problem is that capitalism abhors community, especially egalitarian and
>democratic ones. The permanence of everyday forms of living which allows
>people to develop ways of living with each other is continually disrupted
>by the dynamism of an economy dominated by aggressive profit-seeking.
>Further, a lot of communities have been destroyed by government efforts (in
>alliance with corporate greed) to solve social problems using "urban
>renewal" (what people in Chicago learned to call "Negro removal"),
>freeway-building, and the like.
>
>The kind of communities favored by capitalism are (a) top-down bureaucratic
>communities ("corporate culture"), very much under control, and (b)
>atomized communities joined by such weak links as the passive voting in a
>secret ballot, based on information received by corporate media. Even
>community organizations of people upset about violence and the like seem to
>be subordinated to the official police and encouraged to go in the
>direction of walling themselves off from the world, which encourages
>another kind of atomization.
That is an excellent point indeed. Empricial research of the Chicago
School carried back in 1930s demonstrated a relationship between community
stability and crime rates. I think those findings hold to this day.
More importantly, the dissolution of community by capitalist development
removes social control mechanisms that under normal circumstances mediate
th eprocessing of information and reaction to it. That is likely to result
in the following:
1. Alienated individuals seek to construct they own identity;
2. In that process, they rely on models and resources most readily
available, i.e. pop culture
3. The information supplied by pop culture is not mediated by social
relations (i.e the is nobody to say "look, this is crap") - it the
alienated individual vis a vis the Big Brother, the Tube, the Celebrity.
4. This process of artifical identity creation is likely to pull together
like-minded people and isolate people who differ from each other. That in
turn create a group dynamics that encourages the assumed identities with
the absence of any reality check. Thus in natural communities, if someone
starts acting 'weird,' there are usulally others who impose a variety of
informal sanctions for such 'weird' behavior, and that in most cases
mitigates that behavior. In like-minded identity groups, by contrast,
weird behavior embedded in group's identity receives only positive
reinforcement.
In short, the lack of social control resulting from community dissolution
makes people more prone to media influence, more likely to act based on
that influence. That is why countries like US and Japan have much
different crime rates, even though the violence contents of their media is
not that much different.
Wojtek
