It is interesting that CNN and US broadcast sources who had been using the Serb TV facilities were given private warnings by NATO that they were to be bombed. It seems that they did not pass these warnings on to workers at Serb TV. They left the building knowing that Serb workers were about to be bombed. Perhaps it is US media that are part of the monstrous NATO murderous military machine to paraphrase NATO mouthpieces. Cheers, Ken Hanly Yoshie Furuhashi wrote: > Taken to its logical conclusion, the NATO bombing of Serb TV (and the > argument that it is a legitimate military target since it is part of the > Yugo war machinery) may also be used to further curtail the (already very > narrow) range of views that may be publicly expressed in NATO countries > (especially in the USA). After all, anyone who questions the legitimacy of > NATO must be harboring 'pro-Serb' or 'pro-Milosevic' sympathies, or so the > pro-bombers have been fond of claiming. > > Yoshie > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 18:24:17 +1000 > From: David Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [yugoslavia-discuss] International Journalists Protest NATO Attack > > International Journalists Protest NATO Attack > > BRUSSELS: (South News) April 23 - The International Federation of > Journalists today condemned the NATO bombing of Serbian state television as > "a broken promise that threatens the lives of all journalists and media > staffs." > > ``This bomb attack seems to make a very clear statement that civilian and > particularly media targets are legitimate,'' IFJ General-Secretary Aidan > White told a news conference. ``We need more solidarity with these > journalists, not actions which mean they will be put more in the firing > line,'' White said. > > "Killing journalists and media staff never wins wars or builds democracy, > it only reinforces ignorance, censorship and fear," said Aidan White.The > Brussels-based IFJ is a federation of journalism unions representing about > 450,000 journalists around the world. > > The IFJ condemned NATO’s action in particular as a "broken promise" > following a written commitment from NATO spokesman Jamie Shea ten days ago > to avoid civilian casualties, including journalists. NATO told the IFJ > there was no policy to strike television and radio transmitters as such. > The IFJ further wrote to Javier Solana two days ago calling on NATO to > stick to its promise not to target media after attacks on media close to > the Milosevic family. This appeal was supported by more than 20 freedom of > expression groups world-wide. > > The Serbian state television building in Belgrade was bombed by NATO > Thursday night, killing 10 people and causing 18 injuries, according to > Yugoslav sources several journalists, a make-up artist and an electrician > were among the dead. > > NATO'S missile strike on RTS television has claimed more civilian lives > than any other hit on Belgrade since the conflict began. Shocked staff wept > and held each other on the footpath outside the station, waiting for rescue > workers to dig bodies and survivors out of the rubble. > > NATO argues Serbian television is a legitimate military target because it > spreads ``propaganda'' about the Western air campaign. but drew protests > from journalists around the world. > > The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists said it was "deeply > disturbed" by the bombing of the Belgrade facility, which killed 10 people > and injured at least 20. ``NATO's decision to target civilian broadcast > facilities puts all the journalists working in Yugoslavia at risk,'' said > the group's director for Eastern Europe, Chrystyna Lapychak. ``While we > understand NATO's concern for propaganda, bombing the station is not the > way to counter propaganda.'' > > "This could permanently jeopardize journalists covering conflicts all over > the world," Lapychak said in an interview. "Under the Geneva Convention, > journalists are supposed to be noncombatants." Lapychak also called the > bombing "frightening to us as journalists." > > Alexandre Levy, a spokesman for Paris-based Reporters without Borders, said > the bombing ``creates a very dangerous precedent for press freedom'' and > might put foreign journalists' lives in danger in Yugoslavia. > > The television center in Belgrade had been used to transmit news reports by > international as well as local media, and many independent transmissions > from foreign news crews had been sent from the building. An organization of > European national broadcasters that had used those transmission facilities > expressed concern about the attack. > > ``We do not see how the suppression of news sources can serve any useful > purpose,'' said Albert Scharf, president of the European Broadcasting > Union. "Over and beyond the deaths involved, the EBU is concerned about any > attempt to limit the rights of audiences to full news services, whether > through censorship, distortion of news or destruction of the means of > exchange news". > > The EBU links 68 public broadcasting services in 49 countries. It > supervises news programmes transmitted via the Eurovision and Euroradio > networks. Mr Scharf says Belgrade television had transmitted reports by > international media as well as local news coverage. > > In Rome, the Italian journalists' union condemned the act as "useless > brutality," and Italian TV staff based in Belgrade expressed solidarity > with their Yugoslav colleagues. > > Defence expert Paul Beaver from Jane's Group in London said he found the > attack "shocking" and difficult to understand. "What if western journalists > were feeding information through tapes there at the time? We could have had > western casualties," Mr Beaver said. "I think this will be difficult for > NATO to justify." > > Some of the harshest criticism of the attack, outside of Yugoslavia, came > from Russia, which strongly opposes the entire NATO campaign. Igor > Yakovenko, secretary-general of the Union of Russian Journalists, called > the raid ``an act of vandalism'' aimed directly at civilian journalists. > ``Today's act means the war has spread to another level, when attempts are > being made to crush freedom of speech,'' Yakovenko told the ITAR-Tass news > agency. . > > CNN and the U.S. broadcast networks, which had been feeding videotape from > the building, abandoned it after receiving private warnings from senior > White House and Pentagon officials that NATO would soon hit the facility.
