------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- Date sent: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 16:01:29 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Sid Shniad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: EVACUATION OF KOSOVARS HIGHLIGHTS NATO'S FAILURE The Vancouver Sun April 22, 1999 A Soldier's View EVACUATION OF KOSOVARS HIGHLIGHTS NATO'S FAILURE NATO's humanitarian rationale becomes increasingly muddy. This was supposed to be a war to avoid a humanitarian disaster in Kosovo. Now disaster has spread throughout Serbia, Montenegro, Macedonia, Albania and Kosovo. By Lewis Mackenzie Bracebridge, Ontario — What an obvious confirmation of NATO's failed strategy when the very alliance whose stated mission was to avoid a humanitarian disaster in Kosovo now finds itself trying to find a way to get the remaining 500,000 Albanians out — repeat out — of Kosovo before they die of starvation or exposure. If they are "successful" more than 1.5 million Kosovars will have been expelled during the last year, the vast majority as a result of Slobodan Milosevic's reaction to the first failed round of talks at Rambouillet when U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright opted for threats rather than diplomacy. We are now hearing comments attributed to the U.S. state department indicating that perhaps we should not have started the air campaign against Yugoslavia, but now that we have, "we must win." What madness. To sacrifice young men and women in uniform because NATO's leaders made a mistake or, as some would say, a "miscalculation", is blatantly irresponsible, particularly to the dead soldiers' families. Without question we are revolted and emotionally moved by the forced departure of more than a million ethnic Albanians. However, I am not convinced that war is justified by deportation alone. If it is, we had better get ready for a very bloody 21st century and Canadians had better start lobbying their political leaders to at least double the defence budget. Current estimates suggest that somewhere in the region of 4,000 people have been killed on all sides in the Kosovo conflict over the past year. That is the same as the number killed in Northern Ireland, albeit in a shorter time. Mind you, it is also 1.95 million less than in Tibet; 1.85 million fewer than in Sudan; 950,000 less than in Rwanda and the same figure in Angola; 195,000 fewer than in Bosnia, and there are many, too many, more examples. As disgusting as it is to treat this aspect of the Kosovo crisis as a math exercise, the simple fact that there were no TV cameras in most of the above locations means that we have to find other ways to provide context. What is happening in Kosovo is not genocide. As the Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel stated a few weeks ago, the use of the term in the Kosovc, context is offensive to anyone who survived the Holocaust, and presumably to any Tutsis in Rwanda also. We are now hearing that the CIA believes that a significant number of the missing Albanian men in Kosovo were not rounded up and slaughtered by the Serbs as originally suggested. It is now believed they were forced by the Kosovo Liberation Army to join its ranks unless they could afford to pay a "deferment tax." Evidence of the so-called "rape camps" has yet to be provided as promised. And as someone who was accused by one of the parties to the Bosnian conflict of rape and murder in Sarajevo in 1992, I'm particularly sensitive to the rhetoric surrounding the "rape card." I would like to see some proof before I accept it as justification for expanding the war. I have just returned from three weeks in the Belgrade area and while there I must admit that I was more than a little disappointed by the NATO rhetoric based on hearsay, speculation and erroneous comparisons to the Bosnian conflict. It is disappointing because the Serbs watch CNN, CNBC, the BBC, and a few other western channels and some of their reports are almost as outrageous as those of Serbian state television. As a result, the vast majority of Serbs I met do not trust any TV reports, either western or Serbian. What a missed opportunity for the West to exploit during the various NATO, Pentagon and state department briefings when we could be speaking to the Serbian people, rather than President Milosevic and the press. With respect, I would not buy a used car from the NATO spokesman Jamie Shea. It was my understanding that this was a war to avoid a humanitarian disaster in Kosovo. Well, nice going. We now have a disaster throughout Serbia, Montenegro, Macedonia, Albania and Kosovo and no amount of precision weaponry can stop it. A lot of 20/20 hindsight? No way. A little bit of "we told you so?" Perhaps. Any satisfaction? None at all. Will sanity take over? I doubt it. But surely we must insist on a parliamentary debate — and a free vote — before one Canadian soldier sets foot in Kosovo. Retired major-general Lewis MacKenzie commanded United Nations troops during the siege of Sarajevo in the Bosnian civil war of 1992.
[PEN-L:5820] (Fwd) EVACUATION OF KOSOVARS HIGHLIGHTS NATO'S FAILURE
ts99u-1.cc.umanitoba.ca [130.179.154.224] Fri, 23 Apr 1999 00:45:03 -0500