What is wrong with the logic of of the proposition that: a: there was no ethnic cleansing; b: NATO declares that unless Yugoslavia allows itself to be occupied and Kosovo be declared independent, it will be bombed regardless of how it treats its minority; and c: Yugoslavia decides that the only way it can protect its territory from foreign invasion is to 'clear the region of possible enemy troups and collaborators' (like the US and Canada did in the second world war by clearing the west coast (i.e. ethnic cleansing) of Japanese). I disagreed with the expulsion of the Japanese as much as I dislike the expulsion of the Albanians. But from a military standpoint I understand it and, in the case of Yugoslavia, the military argument is much stronger than the one for the internment of the Japanese by the US and Canada in WW2. Brad seems to be in denial -- it is NATO that initiated the ethnic cleansing, not the Serbs!!!! There would be no -- repeat no -- ethnic cleansing if NATO had not tried to cleanse Kosovo of the Serbs through its bombing campaign. And now we, in Canada, are beginning to get the backlash of the Serb/Milosevic demonization campaign -- Serb kids in Canadian schools being taught by their teachers that the Serbs are evil ethnic oppressors -- reminiscent of the 1930s in Germany. Don't talk to me about the attempt to make every Muslim responsible for the terrorist acts of the KLA when you are attempting to make every Serb and Yugoslav responsible for the terrorist acts of NATO and the military response to those terrorist acts. > >It is we, members of NATO, that have caused the ethnic cleansing by > >our bombing > > > >Paul Phillips > > > Why this strange and pathetic attempt to deny the agency of those who are > undertaking the ethnic cleansing? And why this attempt to make every Muslim > in the region bar responsbility for the terrorist deeds of the KLA? > > > Brad DeLong > >
[PEN-L:6935] Re: Re: Rosser on Kurds/Kosovars
ts99u-1.cc.umanitoba.ca [130.179.154.224] Mon, 17 May 1999 20:33:53 -0500