>>> Yoshie Furuhashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/04/99 05:37PM >>>
They may want to sell it, but marketing efforts seem sporadic +
half-hearted (probably because they don't believe it either). Besides, do
people buy it? What I see in American people's responses to the Clinton
Administration's Kosovo policy, for instance, is mainly indifference or
acquiescence, along with smaller currents of distrust, anger, and
hostility. As far as I know, only cruise-missile liberals + social
democrats (_very few_ in number) who belong to the _opinion-making
professions_ talk and act like as if they bought it. It's hard to sell
MacJobs, sweatshops, deindustrialization, pauperization, debt peonage, &
colonialism as the way forward in 1999. People aren't as naive as Susan
Sontag.

The way I see it, neither the ruling class nor the working class believe in
the rhetoric of 'progress' any longer. The working class seem committed to
a Machiavellian relativism as much as the ruling class are; it's just that
the working class version is a releativism of the powerless while the
ruling class and the governing elite go about their business without even
promising capitalist 'progress' in terms of fatter paychecks.

'Progress' is dead under capitalism. In this sense, I think that
postmodernists have proven to be better at reading the rhetoric and
structure of feelings of the fin-de-siecle capitalism than most
non-pomo/anti-pomo leftists are.

(((((((((((((((((((((((

Chas.: I have to agree with Yoshie's sketch of the feeling tone of today. I would add 
that the working class's consciousness, from my experiences, seems drastically 
individualized. The bourgeoisie have succeeded more than ever in creating a feeling 
among most people that their chances of winning the individual "lottery ticket" of a 
"successful" life is greater than winning for themselves by uniting with others in  
collective struggle. It is the spiral of a negative feedback loop, and the further it 
goes, the less the actual chances of an individual winning by taking the collective 
route. The resignation to the role of dog in a dog-eat-dog struggle actually becomes 
more and more rational. Sociality is atrophying let alone socialism. Whatever.

Charles Brown



Reply via email to