------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- Date sent: Fri, 07 May 1999 18:02:27 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Sid Shniad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: CITIZENS MUST ARRIVE AT INDEPENDENT JUDGMENTS OF THIS WAR The Boston Globe May 4, 1999 CITIZENS MUST ARRIVE AT INDEPENDENT JUDGMENTS OF THIS WAR Ours is now an air war against the civic society of Yugoslavia; it has become a crime against humanity. Now that Jesse Jackson and Viktor Chernomyrdin have provided an opening in the Balkans stalemate, President Clinton should move through it. In his recent interview with UPI, Slobodan Milosevic went on record with these proposals: a cessation of all military activities; the simultaneous withdrawal of NATO troops from Yugoslav border areas and the reduction of Serb forces in Kosovo to a normal garrison level; the return of all refugees; continued negotiations aiming at ''the widest possible autonomy for Kosovo within Serbia;'' free access of refugee relief teams from the UN and the Red Cross; an economic recovery plan for the three Yugoslav Federation states. A seventh point, made clear in the interview, was Milosevic's acceptance of an international peacekeeping force, armed with weapons of self-defense. Here is the heart of the Serb leader's proposal. ''The UN can have a huge mission in Kosovo, if it wants. They can bear witness to the legal behavior of our law-enforcement agencies, and to the fact that everything is now peaceful.'' Administration officials dismissed the Milosevic proposals as ''propaganda spewing from the highest source,'' and the Milosevic approach through Jesse Jackson as ''a PR stunt.'' It is not clear yet what yesterday's meeting between Chernomyrdin and Clinton will lead to, but the initial dismissals of this new attempt to open negotiations is not promising. We citizens must arrive at independent judgments of these developments. In order to do that, we must return to the basic question: What is the purpose of the NATO air war? If it is the vindication of NATO, coupled with the humiliation of Milosevic, then this new set of initiatives must be rejected. But if NATO's purpose is the protection of Kosovar civilians, those hundreds of thousands at the mercy of Serb forces, and, now, of disease and hunger, then Chernomyrdin must absolutely be enabled to build on the Milosevic proposals. These openings offer a way to stop the rapes, murders, and further ''ethnic cleansing,'' and they offer the hope of a substantial reversal of that ethnic cleansing. ''A huge UN mission in Kosovo'' right now is exactly what is required. On the crucial point of whether that force is armed or not, Milosevic has already reversed himself, backing down from his prior rejection even of sidearms. His distinction between ''defensive'' and ''offensive'' weapons can be read more as face-saving than as a deal-breaker. What counts now is the prompt introduction of many thousands of UN peacekeepers, to stand with the vulnerable Kosovars, to bring the eyes and ears of the world back into the killing fields, to ''bear witness,'' exactly, that the atrocities have stopped. NATO insists that any such presence be mainly made up of its own forces, but what difference does it make to terrorized Kosovars whether the helmets of their protectors are green or blue? Whatever happens, this is a turning point in the war. Until now, there has been a painful division between those who see the conflict as a tragic but necessary campaign to stop savage human-rights abuses, and those who see it as a terribly misguided, if initially well- intentioned, effort to stop one kind of unacceptable violence with another. But a resolution to the killing phase of this conflict - a precondition to political resolution of the intractable problems remaining - is now possible. Such are the horrors facing the fugitive population of Kosovo that everything must be put second to the urgent task of rescuing them. Alas, despite the rhetoric of ''Never again!,'' NATO and the White House seem to have lost sight of the endangered human beings they set out to save. Having made the humiliation of Milosevic the central meaning of this war, NATO now seems to be defining negotiation with Milosevic as its own humiliation. If NATO clings to this refusal, we the American people in whose name this war is being waged must understand what it means. From here on out, any pretense that the violence is justified by a defense of human rights is gone. Every woman raped, every village burned, and every refugee dead of starvation or disease will be on the conscience of the West. Meanwhile, NATO's savage air war escalates into its ''domination phase,'' which makes the true character of that campaign crystal clear. NATO prides itself on the pains its flyers take to avoid direct civilian casualties. As Saturday's obliterated bus reminds us, ''collateral damage'' is inevitable. But NATO expressions of regret do not remove the question of criminality. Ours is now an open air war against the civic society of Yugoslavia - as Sunday's attack on the power grid of Belgrade demonstrates. NATO is deliberately causing the destruction of the Yugoslav economy, the pollution of its environment, the degradation of everything necessary to civilization. However it started, the air war has become a crime against humanity. If President Clinton and his partners continue to slap away the possibility of a true and quick rescue of Kosovar Albanians, NATO here and now joins the ranks of the perpetrators, and America, for its part, enters a new age of infamy.
[PEN-L:6565] (Fwd) CITIZENS MUST ARRIVE AT INDEPENDENT JUDGMENTS OF THIS WA
ts99u-1.cc.umanitoba.ca [130.179.154.224] Sun, 9 May 1999 21:46:39 -0500