Rod Hay wrote: > My remarks had a very simple message. If Henry is going to accuse people on > this list of racism, he had better back it up. As I said several times: Now, the individuals on the list that you referred to did not at first accused me of being a reverse racist. Their first line of attack was to ridicule Chinese socialist language as evidence of a collective defect that precludes clear thinking. It is when I pointed out that offensive ridicule as culturally racist that they launched the reverse racist accusation. At any rate, Jim Blaut's paper never once mentioned my name. So why didn't you just attack me. Why attacked his paper? Am I now permanently and personally tied to every racism debate? > And stop copping out everytime by saying. "I am Chinese I can say anything I > want with out being challenged." "Disagreeing with me is racism" or telling > people to calm down after he has throwned a bundle of offensive accusations. Are those direct quotes? Please point out where I wrote that. I welcome your challenge. But please challenge what I said not what I am. I suggest you calm down in your reaction to Jim's paper. You do recognize you are distorting facts in the above statements, I hope. > > So far as I have seen no one on this list has said one racist thing and > Henry has refused to document his accusations. Hmm, that's revealing. > > So far as Mao Thought is concerned, it not a cultural difference. I know > several people of chinese background who see all this crap about "our glorious > leader" as being as ridiculous as it appears to western eyes. And it is not > socialist no matter what language it is in. Some of your best friend are Chinese? Obviously none of your friends are socialists. Try to convince me with your eloquence rather than distortion. Henry C.K. Liu
