200 million "newly poor" created by neo-liberal globalization.
Lets see if DeLong and Sawacky can find humor in that.
DeLong was part of the Administration whose policy casued this to
happen.  He can't blame this one on Mao Zedong.

Henry C.K. Liu


Thursday  June 3  1999

                       World Bank
               estimates 200 million
                      'newly poor'

               ASSOCIATED PRESS
               Updated at 6.10pm:
               In its first detailed look at the impact of the
               Asian financial crisis on global poverty, the
               World Bank estimates the world has 200
               million ''newly poor'' and recommends urgent
               changes in financial rescue programmes to
               protect people, not just economies.

               ''Countries that until recently believed they
               were turning the tide in the fight against
               poverty are witnessing its reemergence,'' said
               bank President James D. Wolfensohn. ''We
               must now draw on the lessons of recent
               experience to help us reshape our strategies
               for the future.''

               Programmes to avoid and deal with financial
               crises in all countries must now boost social
               protections, often called ''safety nets,'' the
               bank said. They include unemployment
               insurance, subsidised school fees, job
               creation, food subsides and other programs
               directly affecting the poor.

               The bank is responding to data showing
               poverty rising again in India, continuing to go
               up in Africa and sharply worsening across
               eastern Europe and central Asia. Indonesia,
               hit early in the crisis, is among the worst off,
               with 30 million more people earning less than
               HK$8 a day than it had before the financial
               collapse.

               Worldwide, the number of people below that
               income, considered the benchmark for abject
               poverty, is estimated at 1.5 billion - up 200
               million from 1993. Final figures for 1999 will
               not be available for several years, but the
               estimate is based on trends since 1.2 billion
               poor were counted in 1987.

               Despite the gloomy outlook, the report said
               there has been widespread progress in health
               and education. And an exception to the
               increase is China, where the number of poor
               is believed to have declined from 280 million
               in 1990 to 125 million in 1997.

               The bank, in a report last week based on a
               survey of Asian companies, concluded that
               Asian economies are recovering more quickly
               than expected from the Asian crisis. The new
               report points to the lasting impact of the crisis
               on some of the world's poorest, diminishing
               hope of cutting worldwide poverty in half by
               2020 - a goal many experts had thought could
               be achieved.

               ''The East Asia crisis and its spillover into
               other emerging markets offers the world an
               opportunity to devise a new approach to
               crisis, one that rightly puts concern for the
               poor and the vulnerable right at the centre of
               its response,'' said World Bank economist
               Giovanna Prennushi, who wrote the report.

               ''By helping countries establish stronger social
               protections, the international community may
               be able to prevent the sudden
               impoverishment of millions of people when
               crisis strikes.''

               The bank has distributed to world
               policymakers a working paper that lays out
               plans for safeguarding the needy before and
               during financial crises. The paper gauges the
               impact of recent developments on the poor in
               East Asia, Latin America and Africa.

               Wage cuts, job reductions, lower rates of
               return on savings, reduced government
               benefits and drops in services such as health
               care and safety can all affect people directly
               and immediately, the paper says,
               recommending guidelines for programs that
               head off such problems.

               A ''pro-poor response'' to all crises could add
               up to 5 per cent to governments costs, but
               could be cheaper, in the long run, than hastily
               prepared relief operations that have no lasting
               impact, it says.



Reply via email to