Let's see if I get the logic of the below.

a) Brenner went to Oxford.
b) Oxford is bad, a source of many Eurocentric misconceptions.
c) therefore Brenner is wrong and bad.
QED

At 09:51 AM 10/12/1999 -0400, Louis Proyect wrote:
>I am considering the possibility of a novel approach to to understanding
>the Brenner thesis. Some years back I was on several mailing
>lists--including this one--with a Justin Schwartz. Justin was proud of his
>connections to Robert Brenner, who he considered a jewel among Analytical
>Marxists, among whom he included himself. He was insistent that real
>Marxism was very, very, very rigorous stuff--which required the scalpel
>like tools of AM to do right. It was also apparently necessary to be
>educated at a proper university where such tools could be mastered, like
>Oxford where he and Brenner were classmates. I get the picture now of a
>couple of middle-class Yids like myself sitting in a classroom at Oxford
>hearing about the exceptional wonders of Great Britain, the early
>breakthroughs in constitutional law, Shakespeare and large farming units
>based on profit. This would be the English equivalent of the sort of
>nonsense dispensed at Harvard University on American exceptionalism.
>
>Now if you were a British kid at Oxford, you would want to gag on this
>tripe. I can imagine someone like Alexander Cockburn or Perry Anderson
>listening to some old fart in robes blathering on about yeoman farmers and
>fantasizing about gunning him down with an AK-47. Apparently some Americans
>found all this rather compelling. So a possible clue to understanding how
>Wood and Brenner line up against Anderson and Blackburn is worship of
>Merrie Old England versus a desire to destroy it like Johnny Rotten.
>
>Myself I can't understand the allure of Oxford. I think the definitive word
>on the school was Laurel and Hardy's classic "Chumps at Oxford." Stan and
>Ollie decide that their careers are going nowhere and they decide that
>what's needed is to get a college degree. So off to Oxford they go. Stan
>gets bumped on the head one day and remembers that he is actually Lord
>Bumpley-Grosbeck or something like that. Not only is he a brilliant
>scholar, he is a great athlete as well. The Oxford students come up to his
>room to lionize him, while Ollie is turned into his valet whom Stan keeps
>referring to as "Fatty". Finally, Stan bumps his head and returns to his
>previous identity. Whereupon Ollie takes revenge...
>
>Louis Proyect
>
>(The Marxism mailing list: http://www.panix.com/~lnp3/marxism.html)

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & 
http://clawww.lmu.edu/Faculty/JDevine/JDevine.html


Reply via email to