Hi Jim and Doug, >Brad writes: >>Positively, totally, utterly, completely nutso. > >Michael, isn't this the kind of abusive rhetoric which gets people expelled >from pen-l. (NB: I'm not in favor of expelling anyone. If Brad doesn't >clean up his act, I encourage everyone to put him on their filter lists.) What's to clean? I'm with Doug on this one. And I, too, was amazed to see "provocative" disparaged by our list owner. Don't most of us hope to be provocative, at least part of the time? Or is it that we're not supposed to provoke the members of the clan (list). But how else can we maintain the health of the community -- how else can we be some sort of certain that our arguments are sound? Jo
- Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism Peter Dorman
- Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky
- Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nat... Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nat... michael
- list decorum Jim Devine
- Brad's rhetoric Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism Joanna Sheldon
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nationalism Brad De Long
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and nat... phillp2
- Thatcher and nationalism Brad DeLong
- Re: Thatcher and nationalis... michael
- Re: Re: Thatcher and nation... Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Re: Thatcher and na... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Thatcher an... Brad De Long
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Thatche... michael
- Public Health & the IMF... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Thatche... Jim Devine