. . .This is the sort of thing that the Reagan NLRB
(and an elder Bush and Dole administration NLRB)
might not have decided although the activities
cited above are clear violations of the NLRA.
Eric


O.K.  That's something.  You are implying that a
Dem appointed NLRB will be significantly *more*
conducive to trade union growth than a Bush one.

Of course, this is one data point.  I wonder if
those with knowledge in this area might comment
on the pattern of such decisions over 1992-98
compared to years after 1980, and what could
be inferred from such patterns, if any, for
trade union growth.

mbs

Reply via email to