. . .This is the sort of thing that the Reagan NLRB (and an elder Bush and Dole administration NLRB) might not have decided although the activities cited above are clear violations of the NLRA. Eric O.K. That's something. You are implying that a Dem appointed NLRB will be significantly *more* conducive to trade union growth than a Bush one. Of course, this is one data point. I wonder if those with knowledge in this area might comment on the pattern of such decisions over 1992-98 compared to years after 1980, and what could be inferred from such patterns, if any, for trade union growth. mbs
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Doug Henwood
- Re: voting for Nader Michael Hoover
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader enilsson
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Justin Schwartz
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Eric Nilsson
- RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Max Sawicky
- Re: Re: voting for Nader Louis Proyect
- RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for... Eric Nilsson
- RE: voting for Nader - and labor... Max Sawicky
- RE: voting for Nader - and ... Nathan Newman
- Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Justin Schwartz
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Forstater, Mathew
- Re: voting for Nader Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: voting for Nader J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Max Sawicky
- Re: Re: Re: Re: voting for Nader Doug Henwood
- Re: voting for Nader martin schiller
- Re: Re: voting for Nader kelley
- Re: voting for Nader martin schiller