You could reverse the conclusions as well.  It depends on how you
use the pubs and parks.

On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 09:10:43AM -0800, martin schiller wrote:
> Michael Perelman said on 11/22/00 8:27 A
> 
> >I am surprised that nobody mentioned the pleasures from public goods -- such
> >as parks -- which have the potential to bring people together rather than the
> >private pleasures that tend to isolate people.
> 
> I would say that parks are places to find solitude and commune with 
> nature while smoky public houses serve the social function of bringing 
> people together.
> 

-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to