.>
>We did not have an entreprenuer to handle our needs, but we did it
>collectively. The
>idea of an entrepreneur -- as used in economics -- is deeply rooted in a
>profit seeking
>individualism.
You were the entrepreneurs. What does an entrepreneur have to be some other
person, an individual? Why does it choke you to say that creating and
satisfying new needs is a fundctuion that workers or consumers can fulfill
themselves, without capitalists? Is this sucha reactionary view? Maybe it
is your background knowledge that I think under socialism the workers will
do this for profist, But as I have been saying here, set that aside. I am
talking about the entrepreneurial function, not a sdpecific instantiantion
of it. How many times do I have to say this?--jks
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
