Doug Henwood wrote: > > Why are ITCs un-Keynesian? JMK himself was interested in stimulating > investment, and presumably raising the after-tax return of capital > expenditures should encourage investment. (Whether it actually does > or not is another issue.) I've never quite understood this. What does the potential 'investor' do with his money if he does _not_ invest it? Use if for wallpaper? Or if he puts it in a bank, what does the bank do with it? etc. Carrol
- Clinton's brag Jim Devine
- Re: Clinton's brag Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Clinton's brag Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Clinton's brag Brad De Long
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Clinton's brag Jim Devine
- Re: RE: Re: Implications of Surplus Tax Cut? Barnet Wagman
- Re: Re: Implications of Surplus Tax Cut? Barnet Wagman
- Re: Implications of Surplus Tax Cut? Ellen Frank
- Re: Re: Implications of Surplus Tax Cut? Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Implications of Surplus Tax Cut? Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Implications of Surplus Tax Cut? Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Implications of Surplus Tax Cut? Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Implications of Surplus T... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Implications of S... Ellen Frank
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Implications ... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Implicati... Ellen Frank
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Impli... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I... Ellen Frank
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re... Ellen Frank
- Re: implications of Surplus Tax Peter Dorman