Michael wrote: >I was under the impression that it was not so much changes in the [US >foodstamp] law, but changes in the interpretation and the implementation >of the law -- as well as misperception on the part of people who might >have otherwise been on welfare. interpretation is crucial. I once heard a lecture by a law prof who argued that it wasn't labor law that turned against US organized labor in the 1970s but instead the way in which the judges interpreted it. (That is, no new legislation was passed.) Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine
- Re: Re: Welfare Reform, from the Horse's Mouth Joel Blau
- Re: Re: Re: Welfare Reform, from the Horse's Mouth Ken Hanly
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Welfare Reform, from the Horse's... Max Sawicky
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Welfare Reform, from the Horse's... Margaret Coleman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Welfare Reform, from the... Eugene Coyle
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Welfare Reform, ... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Welfare Reform, from the Horse's Mouth Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Welfare Reform, from the Horse's... Joel Blau
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Welfare Reform, from the Horse's... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Welfare Reform, from the Horse's... Margaret Coleman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Welfare Reform, from the... Joel Blau
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Welfare Reform, from the... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Welfare Reform, ... Joel Blau
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Welfare Reform, ... Margaret Coleman
