One of the things I'm curious about is what prompted the development of NGT. >From what people have said, it sounds like a minor contribution (if any meaningful contribution at all) to growth theory. I'm wondering: what was the impasse (perceived or real) that prompted development NGT, a theory that seems directed at no particular question at all? Christian ******* Competitive credentialism and the quest for tenure. Ian
- Re: Re: Re: new growth theory Christian Gregory
- Re: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory ALI KADRI
- RE: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory Forstater, Mathew
- Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory Jim Devine
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: new growth theory christian11
- RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory Lisa & Ian Murray
- RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory Forstater, Mathew
- RE: Re: new growth theory Forstater, Mathew
- Re: RE: Re: new growth theory Christian Gregory
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: new growth theory J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- RE: Re: RE: Re: new growth theory Forstater, Mathew
- RE: Re: RE: Re: new growth theory Forstater, Mathew