Are there any positive reasons for Labour's success in Queensland (see 
below) or is this like Mitterand's ability to promote the left by using the 
racists to divide the right?

My other question is what future can a country of 19 million Europeans have 
in a world economy in which their most important neighbours are hundred of 
millions of Asians.

Presumably these shifts and shuffles within bourgeois two and a half party 
democratic politics merely reflect a long economic process in which clearly 
national capital has no answer for working people in Australia.

Chris Burford



BRISBANE, Australia -- Prime Minister John Howard has been dealt another 
election-year body blow by discontented Australian voters.

The weekend state election in Queensland brought a massive victory for the 
Australian Labor Party, which already held power there.

It follows last week's state election in Western Australia, where the ALP 
was swept in to replace Howard's Liberal/National coalition.

The Labor opposition is now being tipped to win the next federal election 
easily.

Discontent is being blamed on a new 10 percent Goods and Services Tax 
(GST), fuel prices and free-market reforms that have hurt people in the 
countryside, known as "the bush."

Howard will be seeking a third consecutive term at the helm of this island 
continent of 19 million people when he calls a national election, expected 
by November.

He will find it hard to resolve the voter dissatisfaction that swept the 
left-of-centre Labor Party back into power in Queensland with a huge 
majority, and which ousted the incumbent conservatives from Western Australia.

Labor gained an unexpectedly large swing of around 10 percent in 
Queensland. In order to oust Howard from the national capital of Canberra, 
Labor needs a swing of 0.6 to 0.8 percent nationwide.

Apart from a massive protest vote that gave Labor state Premier Peter 
Beattie up to 69 of the 89 seats in the local parliament, Saturday's vote 
in Queensland also involved a return for the anti-Asian immigration One 
Nation party.

Having virtually disappeared since it won one million votes in the last 
federal election in 1998, One Nation seemed set to win at least three seats 
in Queensland, well down on the 11 it won at the previous state poll.

Federal Labor leader Kim Beazley said One Nation played no part in the 
massive swing.

Labor's huge victory will send shockwaves through conservatives and give 
Labor politicians a huge morale boost.

"You're going to see policy panic, you're going to see deal panic, you're 
going to see leadership panic from the Liberal Party," Beazley told reporters.

Howard insisted on Sunday that Queensland had voted on local issues while 
admitting it would be "foolish" not to heed the message.

Labor governments now control five of Australia's six states, but most 
importantly have a stranglehold on the three big eastern states, 
Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria, which will determine the national 
election. The coalition's next test is in four weeks with a federal 
by-election in the Liberal seat of Ryan, a Brisbane constituency.

Reply via email to