Profits Byte
By Dean Baker

Profits Byte is published annually upon release of
the
Bureau of Economic Analysis' release of year round
profit
data.  For more information or to subscribe by fax
or email
contact the Center for Economic and Policy
Research at
202 293-5380 ext. 206 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]

********



Profit Share Rises in 2000, Despite Fourth Quarter
Profit Plunge


The capital share of corporate GDP (profits
plus net interest generated in the corporate
sector) rose slightly in 2000 compared with 1999,
from 15.9 to 16.1 percent. The profit share alone
increased by an almost identical amount, rising
from 13.0 percent to 13.1 percent. This increase
incurred in spite of a sharp drop of 6.8 percent
(24.7 percent at an annual rate) in profits in the
4th quarter of the year. The increase in the
capital share puts it near its peak level for the
post-war period, which was reached at the height
of the Vietnam war in 1965, and then nearly
matched with a 16.7 percent share in 1997.

The sharp drop in the profits in the fourth
quarter is by far the most striking feature of
this report. The falloff in profits in the last
six months has been somewhat concealed by the fact
that corporations typically make year-over-year
comparisons in their quarterly reports. Because
profits rose rapidly in the first and second
quarters of 2000, the fourth quarter figures for
2000 are not very different on average than they
were for the fourth quarter of 1999. (Comparing
fourth quarter results, corporate profits, net of
interest, were actually up slightly in nominal
terms, increasing 2.4 percent from the fourth
quarter of 1999 to the fourth quarter of 2000.)

However, for purposes of the economy, the
quarter-to-quarter change in profits has the most
importance. The decline in profits in the fourth
quarter will force firms to change their
behavior. In the first half of 2000 they were
borrowing money at annual rate of more than $540
billion to finance both investment and large stock
purchases (share buybacks and new stock
purchases). This pace of borrowing would have been
unsustainable in any case, but the sharp decline
in profits at the end of the year is forcing a
cutback in both stock acquisition
and investment.

The 4th quarter decline was steepest in the
non-financial sector and was especially sharp in
manufacturing (profits of financial firms actually
rose slightly.) Profits in the non-financial
sector as a whole fell by 12.5 percent, or 41.5
percent at an annual rate. In the manufacturing
sector alone, profits dropped by 21.4 percent in
the fourth quarter, which translates into an
annualized rate of decline of more than 60
percent. The fourth quarter drop in manufacturing
followed a third quarter decline of 4.8 percent.

The drop in before tax corporate profits was
partially offset by a sharper fall-off in tax
payments, so that after-tax profits fell by only
4.8 percent. While the drop in the tax payments is
helpful to corporate balance sheets, it may lead
to somewhat of a shortfall in budget projections.
Corporate tax payments were 6.0 percent below
their pace for fiscal 2000 in the fourth quarter
of 2000, the first quarter of fiscal year 2001.
The Congressional Budget Office projected that
corporate tax payments would be 4 percent higher
in 2001 than 2000. It would take a sharp upturn in
profits in the near future to reach the CBO
figure.

While the impact on the economy may prove
painful -- a cutback in investment and a sharp
drop in stock prices -- the decline in profits in
the last quarter of 2000 was predictable. Profit
shares had reached historically high levels.
This was primarily due to the fact that there had
been a significant shift of income from wages to
profits in the middle years of the decade. The
drop in oil prices in 1998 and 1999 also allowed
workers to get real wage increases that did not
come at the expense of corporate profits. However,
with the low unemployment rate of the late
nineties, it was virtually inevitable that the
wage share would begin to stabilize and possible
even rise somewhat back towards its historic
levels. In addition, firms are apparently finding
themselves unable to fully pass along higher
energy prices, now that the 98-99 decline is being
reversed.

Reply via email to