Trevor,
Here it is in pdf. Let me know if you have any problems opening it. Also, I'd
appreciate comments, suggestions, etc.
Peter
Trevor Evans wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I would be very interested to see a copy of your paper on trade theory. I
> teach a course on international economics and am always on the lookout for
> critical material.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Best wishes
>
> Trevor Evans
> Paul Lincke Ufer 44
> 10999 Berlin
> Tel. +49 30 612 3951
> Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 24 April 2001 21:42
> Subject: [PEN-L:10691] Re: Re: question on trade _theory_
>
> >I'm the offending party. Look at any mainstream trade text (e.g.
> Salvatore);
> >it will have at least one chapter, usually several, on capital mobility.
> Paul
> >Krugman built his career on a wrinkle concerning factor mobility --
> economies
> >of agglomeration, etc. Herman Daly was just wrong on this. Fortunately,
> he
> >seems to have changed his tune.
> >
> >I don't know of a good reading on trade theory from a heterodox
> perspective.
> >If anyone out there can supply one, I'd be grateful. I've written a piece
> that
> >develops the Keynesian critique of trade theory, via a review of Joan
> >Robinson's writings on the subject. I'll send it to anyone who replies to
> me
> >offlist.
> >
> >Peter
> >
> >Bill Burgess wrote:
> >
> >> In _For the Common Good_ , Cobbs and ______ state that factor mobility
> >> (especially of capital) cannot be incorporated in the theory of
> comparative
> >> advantage. Is this correct? I seem to recall someone on this list stating
> >> otherwise.
> >>
> >> Can you suggest a textbook or article that takes up this issue, and that
> >> quickly summarizes various other trade theories (e.g. 'new' trade
> theory)?
> >> I'm filling in for an absent colleague in a second year class discussion
> >> where these issues may come up.
> >>
> >> Bill Burgess
> >> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >
Trade Paper.PDF
