>Rob Schaap wrote: > >>I mean, what's C without M? Doug writes: >Nothing, right? It's not a C unless it's produced and exchanged for M. In theory at least, it would be possible to run a capitalist economy using barter. However, transactions costs would be very steep, while finance would be quite difficult. So M is in effect absolutely necessary. BTW, does the double A in Schaap have anything to do with the fact that sheep say "Baa"? Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Re: the mita Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: the mita Louis Proyect
- Re: the mita Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: the mita Tim Bousquet
- Re: the upper east side! ravi narayan
- RE: Re: Re: the mita Mark Jones
- Re: Re: Re: the mita Michael Pugliese
- Re: Re: Re: the mita Rob Schaap
- Re: Re: Re: Re: the mita Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: Re: the mita Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the mita Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the mita Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the mita Rob Schaap
- Re: the mita Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: the mita Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: the mita Stephen E Philion
- Re: Re: Re: Re: the mita Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the mita Stephen E Philion
- Capitalism 4000 years old? Chris Burford
- Re: Capitalism 4000 years old? Stephen E Philion
- Re: the mita Jim Devine