On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Jim Devine wrote: > > >Jim Devine: > > >Instead of such a single-factor explanation, I'd say that Anglo-American > > >imperialism was _allied with_ the hacienda- and plantation-owners. > > Louis writes: > >Alliances are only made between equals. The "alliance" between > >Anglo-American imperialism and the landed gentry in Latin America was like > >the alliance between Richard Nixon and the black bourgeoisie. Yes, and it's not fair. The Bill Cosby surely would have helped out the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa and abroad instead of selling his soul to CocaCola while activists were calling for its divestment from SA, if only he weren't in an unfair alliance with American imperialism. He had no choice but to go along...just like Hacienda owners in Latin America, who surely wanted to develop a more equitable rural agriculture, but for American imperialism's tying their hands... Steve
- Garbled messages Louis Proyect
- Re: Garbled messages Ken Hanly
- Re Postscript to Garbled messages, was Spinoza.... Carrol Cox
- Re: Re Postscript to Garbled messages, was ... Michael Perelman
- Unfree Labor, Subsistence, & Depend... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Unfree Labor, Subsistence, &am... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Unfree Labor, Subsiste... Louis Proyect
- single-factor theory vs. a... Jim Devine
- Re: single-factor theory v... Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: single-factor theo... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: single-fac... Stephen E Philion
- Re: Re: Re: Re: single-fac... Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: single-factor theo... Michael Perelman
- Re: single-factor theory v... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Unfree Labor, Subsistence,... Yoshie Furuhashi
- RE: Re Postscript to Garbled messages, was ... Mark Jones
- Re: RE: Re Postscript to Garbled messag... Doyle Saylor
- Re: Re: RE: Re Postscript to Garbl... Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re Postscript ... Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: RE: Re Postscript to Garbl... Mark Jones
- RE: RE: Re: RE: Re Postscript ... Max Sawicky
