Carrol says:
>As to Mark's original complaint, you bring it on yourself Mark by your
>determination to maintain a frame of reference for your posts which few
>except. We are going to continue to misread you as long as you take the
>attitude that philosophical agreement is prior to talking about
>strategy. The _content_ for such agreement remains impossibly obscure
>unless it is embodied in at least a tentative strategy, including a
>rough indicaiton of itermediate goals.
Minus a political program & strategy that makes sense, one becomes
like John Landon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (now unsubbed from PEN-l) who
kept ranting against Darwin & posting on the Eonic effect.
Yoshie
