This is very unfruitful. Yes, Rakesh, Doug's response to your initial post was not
polite, but your initial post was far from respectful. Look how your write about
how he "refuses to recognize" "When will Henwood recognize ...."
As I asked you a few weeks ago, please try to communicate in a less angry style. I
think that you are very bright and have a lot to offer, but the vituperation is a
destructive influence.
Rakesh Bhandari wrote:
> Henwood wrote:
>
> Michael Perelman wrote, quoting a comprador Third World trade
> minister writing under the name Rakesh Bhandari:
> ________
> And thereby revealed that he still refuses to recognize that it's not just
> third world trade ministers, neo liberal economists and the big bourgeoisie
>
> So I've got to endure this demented crap here too? You have a very
> selective policy about personal attacks, Michael.
What you write next is not personalized. It is a far more constructive style.
> which unions have repudiated the quota denial to cambodia, the
> protectionist measures in the trade act with africa? which unions have said
> that under the pressure of third world trade unionists they are not going to
> fight for trade/labor rights link?
>
> it does not favor as a first option, sure. but when will USAS accede to state
> restriction on trade? Never? Only if there is clear evidence that trade unions
> and democratic forces what the restriction? Have they put this to a vote?
> Why no clarity on tactics?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
