Dot.bombshell

An ex-internet worker with very burnt fingers claims that the dot.com
bombs were brought down by a Wall Street con. Sarah Left reports

Friday August 31, 2001

If someone offered you a job with a company that had come from nowhere
to be worth billions within a couple of years, promised you millions
of dollars in share options, and talked about changing the world with
an e-commerce company, what would you do?

If you're David Kuo, and the year is 1999, you take the job and
believe the promises. Kuo left a political job to begin working at
ValueAmerica.com in May 1999, about six weeks after the company had
floated on the stock market for $2.5bn.

A little over a year later, he had returned to Washington DC and the
remains of the company's management team had called in the
liquidators.

Kuo made not a penny from his ValueAmerica stock, but he might see
some return from his new book on the subject, Dot.Bomb, a tale of
greed, corruption and ultimately abject failure.

After Boo.com, the Industry Standard, and hosts of other dot.com
collapses, the tales of gallons of champagne, company jets, private
yachts, and personal political ambitions may sound familiar.

ValueAmerica.com was the brainchild of Craig Winn, an American
businessman from Charlottesville, Virginia, who had an idea to build a
company that sold everything from steaks to computers online.

He planned to sell the goods without the warehouses full of inventory
that form a major part of the operating costs of most retail
companies, thus making money by selling goods that ValueAmerica had
never owned.

It was a clever idea, and investors threw money it.

At the height of the hype, Kuo quotes Winn as telling his colleagues:

"We are solving America's retail crisis! It is the biggest problem in
the world. If we do this correctly we'll receive the Nobel prize -
actually I'll get the Nobel prize, but I'll mention you when I get
it."

If it all sounds like a case of greedy, valueless Americans, Kuo now
agrees.

"In a lot of ways this was Lord of the Flies with other people's
money," he said. He blames greed as a major reason for the company's
failure.

"It struck me as being like a political campaign.

"Everybody was trying to speak to and appeal to different constituent
groups: Wall Street investors, the media, business analysts. It's just
that the goal of the operation was to increase our stock price rather
than win votes."

Kuo says that he still has a good relationship with Winn and with most
of the people he mentions in the book, despite the tell-all nature of
the tale.

"Craig deserves to be held accountable for the downfall of the
company, but Wall Street deserves the greatest part of the blame.
Craig discovered that Wall Street had made new rules on how to value
companies, then those rules changed."

While few of us will cry for the investment banks and venture
capitalists who lost money in the tech crash, Kuo does not believe the
whole dot.com debacle was a victimless crime.

The hapless folks at home, swapping shares in front of E*Trade on
their home PCs, got it in the neck when the dot.coms bombed.

"The average retail stock trader read the hype and ultimately financed
the wealth collection of those in the know," Kuo said.

Of course, thousands of employees across the US also paid when the
dot.com companies collapsed under their own hubris.

Some of ValueAmerica's employees had borrowed money against their
stock options, leaving themselves in debt when the redundancies came
around.

Given the excesses of Winn and the investors, why did the company's
employees actually believe the outrageous claims of untold wealth? Did
no one feel sceptical?

"I guess we weren't smart enough," Kuo shrugs. "Americans are not by
their nature all that analytical." The saga ends in the familiar way.
ValueAmerica's assets were sold off for $2m in September 2000, and
part of the mess is still before the courts.

Meanwhile Mr Kuo has returned to politics and is working for the White
House. Craig Winn is living in Charlottesville, and Kuo believes he
will start another company.

"There will be a company like ValueAmerica that is inventory-less and
succeeds. Somebody will create what we could not. The time just was
not right," he concludes.

Dot.bomb is published by Little, Brown and will be available from
September 6.


Reply via email to