At 08:45 AM 09/01/2001 -0700, you wrote: >"We have to admit we know less about things than we thought we did," said >Martin Regalia, chief economist at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. > >Nevertheless, the "we" that knows less than they thought they did still >assumes they know more than the them who never presumed to know so much. >There is a fixed amount of hubris. is this the "lump of hubris" fallacy? Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine
- He's not God after all! Jim Devine
- Re: He's not God after all! Tom Walker
- Re: He's not God after all! Jim Devine
- Re: He's not God after all! Tom Walker