Gar Lipow wrote: >Also there is one other point. In the U.S, anyway the increase in the >ratio of seniors to others is projected to occur alongside a drop in the >ratio of children to population -- so that the total "dependency" ratio >is projected to be a only a tiny bit higher than at present... If you calculate the number of nonworkers per worker, even the rather dire official Social Security calculations show only a minor rise, to levels well below those of the 1950s and 1960s. Doug
- Atlas shrugged Ian Murray
- Re: Atlas shrugged Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Atlas shrugged Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged Gar Lipow
- Re: Atlas shrugged Rob Schaap
- kids & passivity Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged Tim Bousquet
- Re: Re: Atlas shrugged Gar Lipow
- Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged Jim Devine
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged Max Sawicky
- Re: Re: Atlas shrugged Gar Lipow
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Atlas shrugged Ian Murray