Research finds mobile phone cancer threat

ALAN MacDERMID 

The Herald, 5 September, 2001

     USING mobile phones more than doubles the
     risk of developing brain tumours over 10
     years, according to new research.

     The evidence emerged from Sweden
     yesterday as the UK government's senior
     adviser on mobile phones called for the cost of
     calls to be raised to discourage over-use by
     children.

     Sir William Stewart, president of the Royal
     Society of Edinburgh, also attacked recent
     "irresponsible" marketing of mobile phones as
     a back-to-school accessory when he
     addressed the British Association's science
     festival at Glasgow University.

     The study by Lennart Hardell, Professor of
     Oncology at Obrero University in Sweden, is
     one of the most authoritative and damning on
     the subject to date.

     He compared the fate of 1617 patients
     diagnosed with brain tumours since 1997 with
     a control group of healthy subjects.

     Those who had used mobile telephones over
     a 10-year-period were two-and-a-half times
     more likely to have a brain tumour on the
     temporal area of the brain on the side where
     they had held the handset.

     The incidence of cancer of the auditory nerve,
     connecting the ear to the brain, was trebled.

     The research, not yet published, was based on
     use of analogue phones, but Professor Hardell
     said yesterday that digital phones could be
     worse, since they used pulsed microwaves
     and could boost their power 500-fold while
     dialling up.

     He added: "It is too early to give advice on
     GSM digital phones. We will have to wait until
     about 2005 before we can see the effect of
     digital phones. Until then we would use the
     precautionary approach recommended by the
     Stewart report."

     Earlier, Sir William, told the science festival:
     "Children's skulls are not fully developed. They
     are not thickened and they will be using the
     phones for longer."

     He said the available evidence was that
     radiation from phones did not represent a
     direct risk to the public, but there were still
     biological effects. "We do not have evidence
     on what the long-term effects might be."

     Alasdair Philips, of the campaign group
     Powerwatch, told the science festival that a
     survey they carried out showed that 85% of
     children aged 10 to 15 had mobile phones,
     and 10% used them for more than 45 minutes
     a day.

     The phones were at their most powerful when
     they were dialling and searching for a base
     station, and he recommended using a
     hands-free kit or waiting until the number was
     connected before putting the phone up to your
     ear.

     He said 80% of the output of a phone went into
     the user's head, but this was reduced to three
     per cent with a hands-free kit.

     However, if a hands-free kit was used while
     the phone was clipped to the user's belt this
     only led to the emissions reaching the kidneys.

     He said the next generation of phones would
     require less powerful masts but more of them,
     which he regarded as an improvement.

     However, he said it was completely unethical
     for phone companies to provide contracts
     which would give children as much as 600 free
     minutes a month, which they would be sure to
     use up.

Full article at:
http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/archive/5-9-19101-0-23-25.html

Michael Keaney
Mercuria Business School
Martinlaaksontie 36
01620 Vantaa
Finland

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to