IUF \ Open Letter to UK Prime Minister Blair

Telefax
Date: 10 September, 2001
To: UK Prime Minister Tony Blair
Concerns: McDonald's sponsorship of Party Conference

Dear Mr. Prime Minister,

On behalf of the IUF's world-wide membership, I am writing to express my
profound distress at your decision to solicit and accept McDonald's
sponsorship of a reception at New Labour's annual conference. This decision,
in our view, expresses a clear repudiation of the democratic values of the
labour movement, values which New Labour claims to continue to embody
despite disagreements with the party's trade union constituency over some
policies.

The IUF, as an international federation of trade unions, represents more
than 10 million workers around the world. Some of our members work at
McDonald's, a company which makes no secret of its hostility to trade unions
and the internationally-recognised right of workers to collective
representation at the workplace. Workers have, as a rule, been able to
achieve recognition of this right at McDonald's only through dedicated,
tenacious collective resistance to the company's anti-union policies. In
some cases, they have been supported in these efforts by governments
committed to upholding their countries' obligation to defend international
labour rights standards embodied in Conventions of the ILO.

In Russia, our members have been seeking for over two-and-a-half years to
have their union recognised and to engage McDonald's management in
negotiations for a collective agreement. Union members at McDonald's
McComplex food processing plant outside Moscow have been the target of a
systematic campaign of harassment and intimidation, including death threats
against the union president. Their right to bargain collectively with the
company has been defended by the mayor of Moscow and by the Russian State
Duma. McDonald's' well-publicised presence at your party conference,
however, is likely to encourage the anti-union campaign and reinforce the
company's belief that political support for trade union rights is of little
consequence when even New Labour supports McDonald's. And the case of Moscow
McDonald's is but one of many.

A charitable interpretation would dismiss McDonald's' presence at the party
conference as a regrettable lapse in judgement and bad timing, coming as it
does on the heels of the well-publicised child labour scandal in Surrey for
which the company was fined. For McDonald's corporate management and their
franchise holders in the UK and internationally, however, the company's
presence at the party conference will be seen as a positive endorsement of
McDonald's policy. That is to say, as an endorsement of the very policies
the labour movement has always sought to combat. For the IUF, and for our
members, supporters and friends around the world, McDonald's symbolises all
that is wrong with global fast-food capitalism. The McDonald's system is
based on low pay, unsocial hours, dead-end jobs, and the evasion of
corporate social responsibility through the franchising of exploitative work
systems. The McDonald's corporate philosophy embodies a fundamental
opposition to the human rights and dignity of its restaurant employees.

Moreover, McDonald's has distinguished itself by its corporate bullying and
relentless dedication to squashing public discussion of its practices, as
recently exemplified by the UK McLibel trial (in which, you may recall, the
presiding judge substantially agreed with the defendants' description of the
company as anti-union). If New Labour is serious about combating social
exclusion, one would have thought the party conference would be vigorously
debating measures to halt the kinds of workplace practices for which
McDonald's has become notorious. While their sponsorship of the party
conference suggests that debate on these issues will be minimal, it is
nonetheless not too late for you as Prime Minister to publicly express
support for the right of McDonald's employees in the UK and internationally
to be represented by a trade union.

Yours sincerely,


Ron Oswald
General Secretary


Reply via email to