Michael Perelman wrote: >Please Andrew, we have better ways of using our time.
In other words, no political debate, please, we're economists? I don't get what your standards are, Michael. More transparency, please! Doug
- Evidence against bin Laden Ken Hanly
- RE: Evidence against bin Laden Austin, Andrew
- Re: RE: Evidence against bin Laden Jim Devine
- Evidence against bin Laden Rob Schaap
- Re: Re: RE: Evidence against bin Laden Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Evidence against bin Laden Stephen E Philion
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Evidence against bin Laden Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: RE: Evidence against bin Laden Austin, Andrew
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Evidence against bin Laden Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Evidence against bin Laden Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Evidence against bin Laden Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Evidence against bi... Michael Perelman
- Fwd: RE: Re: RE: Evidence against bin Laden Jim Devine
- Evidence against bin Laden Rob Schaap
- Re: Evidence against bin Laden Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Evidence against bin Laden Ian Murray
- Re: Re: Re: Evidence against bin Laden Jim Devine
