Economic Reporting Review, 1/14/02
By Dean Baker

You can sign up to receive ERR every week by
sending a "subscribe
ERR" email request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can find
the latest ERR at
http://www.tompaine.com/news/2000/10/02/index.html
. All ERR prior to
August 2000 are archived at
http://www.fair.org/err/. All ERR after
August 2000 are archived at www.tompaine.com


Outstanding Stories of the Week


Americans, Gradually, Feel Grip of Recession
Louis Uchitelle
New York Times, January 7, 2002, Page A1

This article examines how the impact of the
recession is
gradually being felt by an ever larger segment of
the population.

CBO Reports Rates Bush Economic Proposals Poorly
Glenn Kessler
Washington Post, January 5, 2002, Page A4

This article reports on a study by the
Congressional Budget
Office which evaluates the likely impact of
various stimulus packages
that have been put forward. The study found that
the proposal being
advanced by President Bush and Republicans in
Congress would provide
very little stimulus to the economy.

All That Easy Credit Haunts Detroit Now
Danny Hakim
New York Times, January 6, 2002, Section 3 page 1

This article reports on the relatively high
delinquency rates
on new car loans that have been issued by the
financing divisions of
the major automobile manufacturers. The article
reports that credit
losses may significantly reduce profits in the
next few years.


December Employment Report

Joblessness Rises, but Some Positive Signs Seen
John M. Berry
Washington Post, January 5, 2002, Page E1

Nation's Unemployment Rate Rises to 5.8 Percent
Daniel Altman
New York Times, January 5, 2002

These articles report on the Labor Department's
release of
employment data for December. Both articles note
that the 124,000
decline in jobs measured by the establishment
survey was less than
many analysts had expected. Neither article noted
that private sector
employment fell by 187,000. For many purposes, the
private sector
jobs numbers probably give a better measure of the
current state of
the economy.

At one point the Times article reported that the
rise in the
number of workers on temporary layoffs (176,000)
was considerably
larger than the rise in the number of workers who
reported that they
had permanently lost their jobs (60,000). It took
this as an
indication that firms were increasingly using
layoffs to trim their
workforce, rather than firing workers outright.
This data is not
seasonally adjusted -- the seasonally adjusted
data actually shows a
drop in both temporary layoffs and workers who
have permanently lost
their jobs. More importantly, this data is very
erratic (for example,
the seasonally adjusted number of workers who were
temporarily laid
off was reported as falling by 131,000 in
November, a month in which
close to 400,000 jobs were lost), so monthly
changes are almost
meaningless.


December Retail Sales

Sales Exceed Expectations
Martha McNeil Hamilton
Washington Post, January 11, 2002, Page E3

Data Now In, Retailers Say Merry Holiday
Leslie Kaufman
New York Times, January 6, 2002, page C1

These articles report on data on December retail
sales in
chain stores. The articles note that due to a
strong last week,
chain stores reported an increase of approximately
2.5 percent in
year over year sales for the month. It is worth
noting that the
holiday season in 2000 was an especially weak one,
with year over
year sales increasing by just 0.3 percentage
points. This means that
2002 holiday sales were less than 3.0 percent
higher than 1999 sales,
before adjusting for inflation.



The Euro

On the Road, Euros Smooth the Way
Alan Cowell
New York Times, January 6, 2002, page A8

This article reports on how the euro is
facilitating travel
across Europe, since people no longer have to
change their currency
when they cross a border. At one point, it
suggests that it may
produce a rush of bargain hunting, as consumers
now recognize that
lower prices are available in nearby regions
across the border.

The arithmetic needed to make currency conversions
is simple
division that is taught in most elementary schools
in the United
States in third and fourth grade. Students in
European nations
generally perform better on standardized math
tests than do students
in the United States. Therefore, it is unlikely
that major price
differences were concealed from European consumers
by the use of
different currencies. Also, under law, prices in
the euro zone
nations have been posted in both the national
currency and euros
since 1999.

The Budget

President Hits Back at Daschle's Criticism of Cut
Mike Allen
Washington Post, January 6, 2002, Page A1

Huge Decline Seen in Budget Surplus Over Next
Decade
Richard W. Stevenson
New York Times, January 6, 2002, page A1

Partisan Politics Returns To Capital
Dana Milbank
Washington Post, January 7, 2002, Page A1

These articles discuss the current state of debate
over the
national budget. All three articles present
partisan claims without
giving readers the background information that
would be needed to
accurately evaluate them. Since very few readers
possess the time and
expertise to gather this information on their own,
they would be
unable to assess the claims based on the
information presented.

For example, the article by Allen reports
President Bush's
attack that the Democratic Senate refused to pass
his stimulus
package and adds that this bill provided $30
billion in aid to
workers who have recently lost their jobs. It
would have been
appropriate to add that this bill also contained
more than $60
billion in tax cuts for corporations and high
income individuals.

The article also reports on the Democratic
National
Committee's new advertising campaign, which claims
that President
Bush's tax cuts are jeopardizing Social Security
and Medicare, since
the government is now spending the surplus from
these programs. It
would have been appropriate to remind readers that
these programs are
not affected at all by whether the government
saves or spends their
current surpluses. The programs will hold the
exact same amount of
government bonds in any case.

The article by Stevenson includes an assertion
that Democrats
and Republicans are facing the painful choice
"between cutting the
budget and abandoning any pretense of fiscal
responsibility." The
article does not indicate whose definition of
"fiscal responsibility"
it is using. Many economists have applied the
criterion, that if the
government keeps the ratio of debt to GDP from
rising, then it is
being fiscally responsible, since it can maintain
this borrowing
stance forever.

Applying this standard to the gross debt, which
includes the
bonds held by Social Security and Medicare, the
government would be
able to run deficits of more than $100 billion a
year. The article's
assertion implies that this budgetary rule is
fiscally irresponsible,
but it provides no basis for this assessment.

The article also presents the claims of Democrats,
that long-
term interest rates would be lower if the
Republican tax cut had not
been passed. It would be helpful to give readers
some measure of the
likely impact of the tax cuts on interest rates.
Most evidence
indicates that even very large changes in the
budget have only a
limited impact in interest rates.

For example, real interest rates on mortgages and
corporate
bonds fell by just 0.8 percentage points from the
business cycle peak
in 1989 to the 2000. During this time, the budget
shifted from a
deficit of nearly 3.0 percent of GDP to a surplus
of more than 2.0
percentage points -- a total shift of 5 percentage
points of GDP,
which is more than $500 billion a year at present.
Given this history, the
much smaller shift to deficits implied by the
Republican tax cuts
would only be expected to raise interest rates by
no more than 0.2-
0.3 percentage points.


Argentina

Argentine Unlinks Peso From Dollar, Bracing for
Devaluation and Even
Harder Times
Larry Rohter
New York Times, January 7, 2002, Page A6

This article discusses Argentina's plan to delink
its
currency from the dollar. At one point it
discusses the fiscal record
of Eduardo Dehalde, the country's new president,
when he was governor
of Buenos Aires Province. It notes that the budget
deficit grew
tenfold to $1.6 billion. This information tells
readers almost
nothing about Mr. Duhalde's record. Without
knowing the size of the
total budget, there is no way for a reader to
assess whether a $1.6
billion deficit is large or small. Also, the fact
that the deficit
increased by a factor of ten is meaningless, if
the original size of
the deficit is small. The discussion in the
article implies that this
deficit was irresponsible, but it is impossible to
determine this
based on the evidence presented.

At one point the article asserts that Argentina
must borrow
from foreign lenders. Actually, it can borrow
domestically as well,
although it may have to pay a higher interest rate
if it is forced to
rely exclusively on domestic investors.


No Relief for Argentine Exporters
Anthony Faiola
Washington Post, January 9, 2002, Page E1

This article examines the prospects of Argentina's
exporters
in the wake of the devaluation of the nation's
currency. At one point
it presents the view of Hernan Tevez, the head of
a major dairy
exporter, that his company would greatly benefit
from increased
access to the U.S. dairy market.

It is not clear that Mr. Tevez's view is accurate.
Presently,
U.S. dairy prices are kept above world market
levels by a system of
quotas on both imports and domestic production. If
this system were
relaxed, or eliminated altogether, then dairy
prices in the United
States would fall. This may allow foreign
producers, like Mr. Tevez,
to sell more products in the United States, but at
a much lower
price. On net, this could lead to a fall in
profits. A recent paper
by three prominent trade economists ("CGE Modeling
and Analysis of
Multilateral and Regional Negotiating Options," by
Drusilla Brown,
Alan Deardorff, and Robert Stern) found that most
developing nations
were net losers from the last round of
agricultural trade
liberalization.


Argentina's Plan Stirs Worries Elsewhere
Paul Blustein
Washington Post, January 9, 2002, Page E1

Argentina Told of Conditions for Aid
Paul Blustein and Anthony Faiola
Washington Post, January 10, 2002, Page E1


These articles discuss aspects of Argentina's
recovery plan
and the reactions it is receiving. The articles
indicate that the IMF
may not approve of the plan and may refuse to lend
Argentina money.
The second article makes this point quite
explicitly, reporting that
the IMF and the Bush Administration will not
support new loans to
Argentina if it does not adopt. policies that they
approve.

Recent coverage of the role of the IMF (and Bush
and Clinton
administrations) in Argentina has often implied
that it acted
passively in the situation and had no chose but to
go along with
policies that it recognized as misguided (e.g.
"For IMF, Argentina
Was an Unsolvable Puzzle, by Steven Pearlstein,
Washington Post,
January 3, 2002, Page E1). These articles clearly
show that the IMF
has no problem refusing to assist countries
pursuing policies that it
considers wrong.



Interest Rates

Rates Remain High. Blame Bush Or Big Expectations?
Daniel Altman
New York Times, January 9, 2002, Page C1

This article examines competing explanations for
the
relatively high long-term interest rates in the
United States. It
reports that Democrats have pointed to the impact
of smaller surplus
projections as a result of President Bush's tax
cut. Republicans have
argued that the main cause is the market's
expectation that the
economy is about to experience a strong recovery.

The article neglects a third obvious explanation.
The United
States is running an unsustainable trade deficit.
If the trade
deficit remained at its current share of GDP, the
net foreign debt of
the U.S. would exceed 60 percent of GDP by the end
of the decade -- a
level of indebtedness far higher than any
industrialized country has
ever experienced. In order to reduce the deficit
to a sustainable
level, the dollar will have to fall by 20 to 30
percent. If investors
anticipate that the dollar will fall, then they
will demand an
interest rate premium to hold debt denominated in
dollars, rather
than other currencies. This could easily explain
the relatively high
long-term rates the United States is currently
experiencing.


Health Care

Part Battles Looming Over Costly Old Issue: Health
Care Coverage
Robin Toner
New York Times, January 11, 2002, Page A16

This article discusses prospective debates in
Congress on
measures designed to extend insurance coverage. It
would have been
appropriate to note that the United States spends
more than 14
percent of its GDP on health care, approximately
twice the average
for industrialized nations. In spite of this
higher level of
spending, the United States generally ranks near
the bottom of this
group in health outcomes, such as life expectancy
and infant
mortality rates.


Japan

Bad News Keeps Coming For Japanese Economy
James Brooke
New York Times, January 10, 2002, Page W1

This article reports on the decision of Merrill
Lynch to
scale back its operations in Japan, laying off
workers and closing
most of its offices. At one point it comments that
because interest
rates are near zero and the government already has
a large debt, "the
only macroeconomic tool left" is devaluing the
currency. Actually,
the central bank could deliberately try to produce
a modest rate of
inflation (2-3 percent), which would lower real
interest rates and
increase the incentive to invest and consume. Many
prominent
economists, such as Princeton University professor
Paul Krugman have
advocated this policy.




Reply via email to