> >But the argument that workers contribute more to the value of output >than they receive in compensation does not necessarily imply that >either: > >a) labor is the only source of value > >or > >b) that workers are entitled morally to a wage equal to the value of >their contribution > >right? > Right. Moreover the proposition that you state is obviously true, and will be accepted by any sentient being who thinks about the matter for a second. jks _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: query: Historical Materialism Justin Schwartz
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: query: Historical Mater... Alan Cibils
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: query: HistoricalMateri... Rakesh Bhandari
- RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: query: Historical Materialis... Davies, Daniel
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: query: Historical Materialism Justin Schwartz
- Re: RE: Re: Re: query: Historical Materialism Justin Schwartz
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: query: Historical Materi... Justin Schwartz
- RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: query: Historical Materialis... Forstater, Mathew
- Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: query:Historical Mat... Justin Schwartz
- RE: Re: Re: query: Historical Materialism Devine, James
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: query: Historical Materialis... Justin Schwartz