Re: Re: Re: Re: On the necessity of socialism

[Carrol Cox]

miyachi wrote:
> 
> 
> There is not "necessity of socialism" Rather, there is only possibility of
> socialism.

Socialism is necessary in the sense in which food is necessary: not as
something which will be but as something that must be if we are to
survive.

It is pure religiosity to claim that socialism _will_ come; it is close
to self-evident that unless it comes we will plunge ever deeper into the
barbarism RL predicted.

Doug doesn't like quotes, but no one has ever said it better than Mao:
If you don't hit it, it won't fall.

Carrol