BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, DAILY REPORT, FRIDAY, MARCH 1, 2002:

RELEASED TODAY:  In May 2001, 19.8 million persons usually did some work at
home as part of their primary job, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported
today.  These workers, who reported working at home at least once per week,
accounted for 15 percent of total employment.  These findings are from a
special supplement to the May 2001 Current Population Survey (CPS).  The CPS
is a monthly survey of households conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau for
BLS.  Data on work at home were last collected in the CPS in May 1997;
however, due to changes in the questions asked, much of the data for May
2001 is not comparable with the May 1997 data.  In 2001, half of those who
usually worked at home were wage and salary workers who took work home from
the job on an unpaid basis.  Another 17 percent had a formal arrangement
with their employer to be paid for the work they did at home.  The remainder
who worked at home -- 30 percent -- were self-employed.

Mass layoff events totaled 2,146 in January resulting in job losses for
263,821 workers, according to figures released by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics. The number of initial claimants for unemployment insurance was
the highest for the month of January since the series began in April 1995.
The number of mass layoff events dropped from December, when 2,440 events
resulted in 268,893 initial claimants, according to BLS (Daily Labor Report,
page D-15).

New claims for unemployment insurance benefits during the week ending
February 23 totaled 378,000, an increase of 17,000 from the previous week's
revised figure of 361,000, according to figures from the Employment and
Training Administration (Daily Labor Report, page D-12).

The help-wanted advertising index was unchanged in January, standing at the
December index level of 47, the Conference Board says. The index was 77 a
year ago.  Help-wanted advertising increased in six of the nine U.S. regions
in the last 3 months, the Conference Board reports.  The Mountain region,
which includes Denver, Phoenix, and Salt Lake City, increased 28.8 percent.
The East South Central region, which includes Birmingham, Knoxville,
Louisville, Memphis, and Nashville, saw a 10.1 percent increase (Daily Labor
Report, page A-9).

The U.S. economy bounced back from the shock of the September 11 terrorist
attacks to grow at a much faster rate in the final 3 months of last year
than initially estimated, the Commerce Department reported yesterday.
Fueled in large part by consumer spending, the nation's economic output rose
at a 1.4 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter, the department said,
sharply revising the earlier estimate of a meager 0.2 percent annual growth
rate. Even though economists at the National Bureau of Economic Research
said a recession officially began last spring, the new figures indicate that
overall economic activity declined only in the third quarter of last year
(John M. Berry, The Washington Post, page A1). "What drove up consumer
spending in the fourth quarter, and is still driving it up, was zero-percent
financing, price discounts, tax rebates, and huge promotional pricing for
big-ticket items," says James W. Paulsen, a senior economist at Wells
Capital Management in Minneapolis (Louis Uchitelle, The New York Times, page
C2).

As recessions go, the one that officially started last year appears to be
one of the strangest.  A few economists, in fact, aren't even sure a
recession occurred.  Their argument was bolstered by the Commerce
Department's revision of fourth quarter economic growth.  The department now
figures the economy grew at a 1.4 percent annual rate, up from the
government's previous estimate of 0.2 percent, thanks to surprisingly strong
consumer spending on automobiles and other products (The Wall Street
Journal, page A2).

Consumers spent briskly in January, as their incomes rose solidly, the
Commerce Department reported today.  The news was a fresh sign that the U.S.
economy, shaken by the recession and terrorist attacks, is on the road to
recovery.  Spending by consumers, which accounts for two-thirds of all
economy activity in the United States, rose 0.4 percent last month after
being flat in December.  At the same time Americans' incomes, which include
wages, interest, and government benefits, also increased by 0.4 percent, the
largest advance in 6 months.  Incomes rose 0.3 percent in December (Jeannine
Aversa, Associated Press,
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-020301econ.story). 

U.S. consumer spending posted a robust gain in January, 0.4 percent, its
best showing since October.  Income growth kept pace, climbing by 0.4
percent in the month.  Disposable income -- income minus taxes -- grew a
hefty 1.6 percent, boosted by changes in January tax withholding made as a
result of income tax cuts enacted last year.  Analysts polled by Reuters had
expected income to post a smaller 0.1 percent gain, and spending to see a
0.3 percent increase (Reuters,
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/bayarea/business/2771711.htm). 

U.S. manufacturing activity rose for the first time in 18 months, thanks to
a rise in orders and increased production, while consumer spending and
construction grew solidly, fresh signs that an economy shaken by the
recession and the terrorist attacks is on the road to recovery.  The
Institute for Supply Management, formerly known as the National Association
of Purchasing Management, reported that its index of business activity
jumped to 54.7 in February from 49.9 in January, suggesting the battered
manufacturing sector has pulled out of a long slump.  An index above 50
signifies expansion, while a figure below 50 shows contraction ( Associated
Press, Jeannine Aversa, Lisi de Bourbon,
http://www.nandotimes.com/business/story/277637p-2516025c.html).

Paid leave and flexibility over working hours will take on increasing
importance over the next 10 years, as the labor market shrinks and the
nature of the workforce changes, according to two policy analysts who spoke
to the Washington, D.C. chapter of the Industrial Relations Research
Association (Daily Labor Report, page A-10). 

<<application/ms-tnef>>

Reply via email to