The Times (London), May 29, 2002

IMF accused of causing food crisis in Malawi 

The International Monetary Fund has denied allegations that it was
partially responsible for the gathering famine in Malawi. 

The Washington-based institution has been blamed for putting pressure on
President Muluzi to sell off maize reserves to save money on storage and to
repay foreign debts at the very moment when the harvest failed. 

Aleke Banda, Malawi's Agriculture Minister, and Western aid agencies,
including the Save the Children Fund, have claimed that the IMF and Western
donors pushed Malawi into selling the reserves. 

The row has thrown a spotlight on to the seemingly irreconcilable goals of
sound financial discipline required by the IMF among developing countries
in exchange for financial assistance and the need to maintain expensive
food surpluses to avert sudden food crises. Malawi sold off virtually all
its stock of 167,000 tonnes of maize, the staple diet for most of the 11
million inhabitants in the impoverished Central African country, in August
2000. This was after unprecedented floods earlier in the year had ravaged
production.The floods, followed by drought, left Malawi with a shortfall of
about 600,000 tonnes and made the hardest-hit of the six Southern African
countries -along with Zambia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Swaziland and Lesotho
-that are struggling to cope with their worst food emergency in almost five
decades. 

Food shortages in Malawi are now so severe that farmers are sleeping in
their fields to protect their withering crops from thieves. People caught
stealing maize are said to have had their hands and ears chopped off, a
sign of mounting violence and social disintegration unprecedented in the
former British colony. 

====

Members [of the WTO Secretariat] pointed out that Malawi's agricultural
policies aimed at food security and rural development. They questioned the
impact of communal land ownership on agricultural development and planned
reforms in the sector, mainly in land tenure.

http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp189_e.htm

====

Accordingly, the government's strategy to further enhance the role of the
private sector in agriculture rests crucially on the accelerated
divestiture of its assets. To this end, the government will prepare a
time-bound program for the commercialization and privatization of ADMARC by
end-March 1999, and begin implementing the process shortly thereafter.
Beginning with the 1999/2000 crop season, the government will no longer be
involved in direct procurement, import, or sale of maize, and ADMARC will
operate on purely commercial terms.

http://www.essentialaction.org/labor_report/malawi.html

====

The Times (London), February 2, 2002, Saturday 

Blair's great African sell-off 
Privatisation of Attlee's aid agency hits 'poorest of the poor' 

TONY BLAIR'S new mission to heal "the scar" of Africa risks being
undermined by his Government's plan to sell off the British organisation
that has pioneered investment in the Third World. 

MPs, aid organisations and environmental groups have expressed alarm at the
manner in which the former Commonwealth Development Corporation, which has
been renamed CDC Capital Partners, has been diverted from its founding
principles. 

Measures taken to prepare CDC for partial privatisation have seen the
scrapping of loans for African agricultural projects, as well as the
closure of offices in some of the continent's most deprived countries,
including Uganda, Malawi and Ivory Coast. . .

The CDC was set up 50 years ago by Clement Attlee's postwar Labour
Government. In 1997 the Prime Minister announced plans to sell off up to 60
per cent of CDC, in a partial privatisation that Clare Short, the
International Development Secretary, said would release funds for more aid
projects. Since then CDC has sought to rid itself of its long-term
agricultural investments, which have average returns of 6 to 8 per cent. 

Mr Gillespie hopes to attract new private capital by channelling funds
instead into telecommunications, shopping malls, banks and energy firms,
which can offer rates of return of 25 per cent. 

Louis Proyect
Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org

Reply via email to