>> I read it as a derivation of "perpetuate" >> or "perpetuity" perpetuance? Perpetuant? >> A truant pet? A pet per to chance? Pet purr to nuance? >> > ============== > > Then again it might have just been a production > error at the typesetter's that hasn't been corrected. > There's no dictionary entry for the term. > > Ian
Now, let us think whether there is any connection between this and Michael's claim that markets and information don't mix. I told the story to some "neoclassicals" and they found it "interesting", by the way. Sabri
