Police to spy on all emails

Fury over Europe's secret plan to access computer and phone data

Kamal Ahmed, political editor
Sunday June 9, 2002
The Observer

Millions of personal emails, other internet information and
telephone records are to be made accessible to the police and
intelligence services in a move that has been denounced by
critics as one of the most wide-ranging extensions of state power
over private information.

Plans being drawn up by Europol, the police and intelligence arm
of the European Union, propose that telephone and internet firms
retain millions of pieces of data - including details of visits
to internet chat rooms, and of calls made on mobile phones and
text messages.

In a move that has been condemned by privacy campaigners, a draft
document passed to The Observer reveals that the EU is now
drawing up a 'common code' on data retention which will be
applicable in all member states.

Security and police sources said new powers on accessing personal
data will come into force in Britain towards the end of the year.

'It is typical that such a significant change in the control over
private information is being worked out in secret,' said Dr Ian
Brown, a leading expert on data privacy and director of the
Foundation for Information Policy Research.

'It does seem to have been Britain that has put pressure on other
member states to put in place this type of legislation. In 99 per
cent of cases it will be used properly, but what about the other
one per cent? There is not enough scrutiny of what is going on.'

The Europol document was drawn up at a private meeting of police,
intelligence services and customs and excise officials from
across Europe in The Hague last April. It lists 10 areas where
companies will be required to keep information to help in the
fight against international terrorism, domestic crime and drug
running.

Companies that run internet sites will be required to retain
passwords used by individuals, record which website addresses are
visited, and keep details of webpages looked at and any credit
card or bank details used for subscriptions.

The information retained about emails will include who sent the
message, where the email went, its contents and the time and date
it was sent.

It is believed that Britain will push for the data to be kept for
up to five years. At the moment much of it is only kept for one
or two months, for billing purposes, by the companies that run
internet and email services.

Sources at the National High-tech Crime Unit, which is overseeing
implementation of plans for data retention in Britain, point out
that the growth of so-called 'cyber crime' means that they need
new powers to keep ahead of the criminals.

One official also said that investigations into crimes such as
the murders carried out by the GP Harold Shipman relied on the
retention of old telephone records.

'We need to codify how this happens, so all countries in Europe
are dealing with the same set of rules,' the source said.

'The internet does not recognise national boundaries and
international companies don't need the confusion of dealing with
separate codes in different countries.' The Europol document says
the use of telephones - land lines and mobiles - will be
monitored. Numbers dialled, when and where they were dialled from
and personal details such as the address, date of birth and bank
details of the subscriber who paid for the call will also be
kept.

The document, headed 'Expert Meeting on Cyber Crime: Data
Retention', suggests mobile phones records could be used by
police and the intelligence services to track the geographical
location of people making calls.

Mobiles use a network of masts to convey the calls, placing the
user in a geographically distinct 'cell' at the time of the call.
Records using such geographical locations were used to acquit the
teenagers accused of murdering Damilola Taylor.

The Association of Chief Police Officers is also drawing up a
manual of standards so that police forces across the country use
similar methods when accessing the data.

Full at:
http://www.observer.co.uk/politics/story/0,6903,730091,00.html

Reply via email to